Hi!

On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Tim Marston <[email protected]> wrote:

> OK, thanks.  That is what I thought.
>
> The calibrated display I have was calibrated with a colorhug
> (http://www.hughsie.com/), so the colour profile was created
> specifically for the display.
>
> Sorry if this seems like a stupid question, but I just want to make sure
> I understand the situation.  Are you saying that I should set the
> display colourspace to sRGB for the calibrated display as well?  And let
> the system's colour profile correct it, as usual?
>

The system profile will not be applied if you use sRGB - then it uses
"default" values. Let me explain. When you computer sends out information
to your monitor "display a pixel value of 0,0,255", it will display a green
color. However WHICH exact green color is displayed will be different for
each monitor, since a computer isn't able to say in which colorspace it is.

If you could say "Display color 0,0,255 in colorspace sRGB" that would give
you an indication of an exact color that should be displayed, however that
is not how things work, and that is what color profiles do. So when the
"Display color 0,0,255 in colorspace sRGB" is given to the profile, it may
transform it to "display color 1,3,240 on the monitor" because what the
monitor displays is what corresponds to 0,0,255 in sRGB.

So, in theory, if you do have a monitor profile, use that, and colors
should be more precise. However, since sRGB is assumed "standard" for many
monitors, they are calibrated to display that well. However, you can easily
find monitors that can switch to AdobeRGB as standard input - but if you
display sRGB images on these monitors without transforming them to
AdobeRGB, they will look overly saturated for instance.

Use your best judgement - you may find out things like the monitor profile
is best for displaying skin tones, whereas sRGB gives you a better
impression of light levels, or the other way around or something completely
different. Just be aware that color profiling isn't an exact science and as
all photographers will tell you, most monitors suck and display their
images completely wrong. The best you can do is get an impression on how
your monitors differ from other displays, so you are aware of that when you
do your adjustments. Also note that people get used to their displays, so
they automatically compensate for their problems when looking at images.

Regards, Klaus Post

http://www.klauspost.com
_______________________________________________
Rawstudio-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://rawstudio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rawstudio-users

Reply via email to