Holger Levsen wrote:
> Rather (if we go this route), salsa will be the upstream bug tracker and
> the BTS will be for Debian issues. And like with all other packages in
> Debian, sometimes users will report upstream issues in the BTS and we as
> maintainers should (or could/can) forward them to the upstream tracker,
> which will be on salsa.
My reading of this is that (ignoring Debian-specific issues as they
are an "easy" case IMHO) salsa becomes the single source of truth; ie.
we both encourage and at least aim to forward/refile all "upstream"
bugs to Salsa.
I'm totally cool with that, I only insist on it not being undefined or
ambiguous.
Best wishes,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` [email protected] / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
To change your subscription options, visit
https://lists.reproducible-builds.org/listinfo/rb-general.
To unsubscribe, send an email to
[email protected].
