Good idea Dennis-

I'll give that a whirl.

Thanks!

Lee

Bailey & Associates
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: 772-597-0040
Fax: 772-597-0043 

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dennis McGrath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "RBASE-L Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 6:26 PM
Subject: [RBASE-L] - RE: What's up with this?


> Use the 
> CREATE VIEW viewname (columnlist) AS SELECT .......
> syntax.  You will never get burned that way.
> 
> I have a command file for each view or group of related views which I
> can run to create or modify them.
> 
> Also,  When I want to create a view I ask myself "Does this view need
> to remain in the database definition?"  If not, I use a TEMPORARY view
> which I can create on the fly in my command file.  Saves a lot of
> maintenance.
> 
> Dennis McGrath
> 
> 
> --- "Walker, Buddy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Lee
> >   I've seen this happen when you create a view using the * indicating
> > you want to use all the columns in the table. I don't use the * I
> > specify all the columns by name.
> >  
> > Buddy
> > 
> > -----Original Message----- 
> > From: Lee Bailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> > Sent: Thu 1/9/2003 4:41 PM 
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > Cc: 
> > Subject: [RBASE-L] - What's up with this?
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Hello everyone-
> >  
> > When I use my latest Windows 6.5++ single user RBase version with the
> > latest build, whenever I add a column to a table that is used in a
> > multi-table view, double clicking the corresponding view causes the
> > view
> > to not open.  This has been my indication that the view needs to be
> > "updated" so as to now reflect the enlarged table used within the
> > view.
> >  
> > Once I edit the view, the view works once again, and is available and
> > can be used outright, or with the related forms and programming.
> >  
> > I recently bought the 6.5++ multi user pack, and re-installed the
> > system
> > from scratch, as instructed with the package.
> >  
> > What's interesting, is that when adding a column to the same table as
> > before, the respective view works just fine (by double clicking it),
> > but
> > a form associated with the view now does not work until the view is
> > again updated via the same method as before.  
> >  
> > This scenario causes a command file to bomb out when trying to use
> > the
> > form until the view is updated.  Unfortunately, if I happen to miss a
> > view to be updated-- we are done.
> >  
> > Is this what everyone else is experiencing?
> >  
> > I like the old way better, as it is a cleaner way to see if your
> > views
> > are up to date.  Double clicking a view either works or it doesn't.  
> >  
> > Lee Bailey
> >  
> > Bailey & Associates
> > E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> > Phone: 772-597-0040
> > Fax: 772-597-0043 
> >  
> >   
> > 
> 

Reply via email to