Don't get me wrong, the product is light years ahead of anything else. I have been using Rbase for almost 19 years and the guys here think it can walk on water. That is mostly due to the products capabilities.
I always like to keep the product on the forefront with my enhancement requests. RBTI has always been responsive when I have had a showstopper but there are always something I would like to see. Dan Goldberg -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of MikeB Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 1:55 PM To: RBASE-L Mailing List Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: Official Release of R:BASE 7.6 and TurboV-8 Updates That and the reminder that occasionally the enhancement requests' workaround is so trivial that inclusion in the EXE of every such workaround would eventually bring the product to its' knees, literally. The product as it stands today virtually sings by comparison (what am I saying.. there is no comparison!) to anything else remotely similar, in large part to the extension and expansion of the macro language by RBTI. There is little you cannot do with a little effort on your part and when you truly are against the wall without any remedy, the good folks at RBTI have always had an open mind and a helping hand. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dan" <[email protected]> To: "RBASE-L Mailing List" <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 4:36 PM Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: Official Release of R:BASE 7.6 and TurboV-8 Updates > Dan, > This is quite normal. Many of the suggestions that I had made in > the earlier years of the windows versions of R:base went un-marked > until I put up a fuss, then they marked them as 'No Plans to Include' > but are now part and parcel of the R:base you always wanted. Keep > making suggestions. They may happen at some time. > Dan > > At 12:55 PM 2/17/2009, you wrote: >>I submitted them on the rbti site as enhancement requests. There has >>been no status assigned in quite some time. >> >>Dan >> >> >>---------- >>From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of >>[email protected] >>Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 8:59 AM >>To: RBASE-L Mailing List >>Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: Official Release of R:BASE 7.6 and Turbo V-8 >>Updates >> >>Dan: Did you do this through the "proper" channels and suggest it >>on the Developers website? If so, what did they put down as the >>"status" of your enhancements? If you only made the suggestions >>thru this list or wrote an email to someone directly at RBTI, then I >>don't think it gets in the queue. >> >>Karen >> >> >>>I know there are workarounds to these items. That is why they are >>>enhancement requests. >>> >>>As a supporter of rapid application development, these would be >>>time savers for me and would increase functionality for my users. >>> >>>That way I can tell my boss that the money we paid for SAP makes a >>>difference... >>> >>>Dan Goldberg >>> >>>From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bill >>>Downall >>>Sent: > > Thanks, > > Dan > > Dan Champion > Information Services > Vredevoogd Heating > 3047 Sangra SW > Grandville, MI 49504 > (616) 534-8271 x10 > > Or > > Dan Champion > Champion Solutions > 1415 Laughlin Dr. > Grand Rapids, MI. 49504 > (616) 453-7225 > ICQ 6686404
