Since most of this is old code that works I didn’t worry about it. It would seem that after going through this block of code it would find any errors if that was the problem. I will try to rework it anyway just to make sure.
I usually get busy adding new cool features instead of tweaking old code I had for years. This form does some really cool things and it one of the major selling points of my app. Thanks for all the suggestions Marc From: A.G. IJntema Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 3:17 PM To: RBASE-L Mailing List Subject: [RBASE-L] - RE: Data corruption Jan, I suppose you make use of 64 bits version. Have you ever considered to adjust your variable naming convention to the new possibilities of R:Base. In practice there are no limits anymore with regards to the length of the variable name. So I have implemented a whole new variable naming convention for myself. Special about this convention is that every variable starts with a letter followed by an underscore Secondly I make a distinction between local variables, global variables and global constants At the end of every routine you simply can clear all local variables by using (for instance): Clear all var L_* It helps a lot to keep the application readable and testable Tony IJntema From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of jan johansen Sent: donderdag 17 maart 2011 18:26 To: RBASE-L Mailing List Subject: [RBASE-L] - RE: Data corruption Marc, I'm currently running the V91 compiler. I have had intermittant reports from a couple of users that they get an error message after they do about 60 items. Currently I'm leaning towards a variable or something that I am failing to clear or something but haven't had time to chase it yet. Jan Note to Razzak: I am in no way implying that there is a problem with your product. -----Original Message----- From: "MDRD" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] (RBASE-L Mailing List) Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 12:19:04 -0500 Subject: [RBASE-L] - RE: Data corruption Paul They do a full Unload all at least monthly w/o errors. So the hiccup and corrupt packets seems to be the most likely cause. But their computer tech installed new computers and network stuff and says it checks out. I know just because it looks OK when they check it does not mean it is not causing hiccups every few weeks. Another office had this same problem, we not have them enter 10 rows at a time then run Autochk to check for errors to try to narrow down what is going on. Since they started only doing 10 rows at a time they have not had the problem, not yet at least. Either they are lucky or I was thinking that doing 50+ rows was maxing something out? Not sure what that could be. Thanks, I would to find a packet sniffer that is easy to use, once in a blue moon we have an office with different "corrupt" data in another table. They get custnums like 349,545,112 which they do not have any that big. We have PK and FK on the custnum field and you can not enter a bogus custnum without RBase stopping you. So, I always them them it is a computer hiccup that is scrambling the data. Marc -----Original Message----- From: Paul Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 12:01 PM To: RBASE-L Mailing List Subject: [RBASE-L] - RE: Data corruption Marc- Grab a copy and do the 'Razzak routine' to verify data integrity. Unload, Load and watch for errors! Do this on a copy. Also RScope your local copy bakup from them and see what the results are, or simply start with a Autochk full review the results. If all is good, it is most likely a hiccup as you say. Most likely packet loss etc..... But would get you started in looking in the right direction. Data secure and no issues - Packet loss and you are lucky (client is real lucky one) Data/rows bad no see what happened on reload, issues might be from code (eep, cmd, etc...) or packet loss. Depends on the problem. A lot of new sniffers out there, I ran across a real neat one and if I locate it I will let you know. Paul -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of MDRD Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 12:01 PM To: RBASE-L Mailing List Subject: [RBASE-L] - RE: Data corruption Paul No RScope at that location. I wonder if this is a computer hiccup, Thanks Marc -----Original Message----- From: Paul Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 10:54 AM To: RBASE-L Mailing List Subject: [RBASE-L] - RE: Data corruption Does not look like RScope: " Anyway, their tech found this degug file and thought it might help. " location=5 idprev=140053707 to_ptr=140058625 rputrow_rowid=140083201 location=5 idprev=140774603 to_ptr=140779521 rputrow_rowid=140812289 location=5 idprev=142175435 to_ptr=142180353 rputrow_rowid=142196737 location=5 idprev=148008139 to_ptr=148013057 rputrow_rowid=148086785 location=5 idprev=154881227 to_ptr=154902529 rputrow_rowid=154918913 location=5 idprev=153980107 to_ptr=153985025 rputrow_rowid=154001409 location=5 idprev=164162763 to_ptr=164167681 rputrow_rowid=164192257 location=5 idprev=181005515 to_ptr=181010433 rputrow_rowid=181026817 However row pointers are most likely wrong, do you have RScope for this location? Paul -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of MDRD Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 10:19 AM To: RBASE-L Mailing List Subject: [RBASE-L] - Data corruption Well its back, this one office that was corruption free for about a year just had it again. It is always the same table for some strange reason. It makes me wonder if there is some atypical data in one of the look up tables for some code that is only used once in a great while, when that lookup code is entered the “atypical” data corrupts the table. Just trying to think out of the box. If it was my code or RBase I would think it would happen more often, unless it is a combination of things. I also wondered it it could be when they use that form to enter 50+ rows of data at once, if some sort of limit or cache fills up the corruption hits? Anyway, their tech found this degug file and thought it might help. I am not sure when this file was generated, I am not doing anything that I know of to create it. This is an important office, they belong to a group of about 20 users I have. They are using a 7.6 compiled app, they never had this problem using 7.5 but I updated this form and changed a Note field to Varchar, if that gives a clue, also I changed some code. But if my code was bad I would expect this error daily. Either way, unless I can nail this down it will be hard to get them to update again. Thanks Marc location=5 idprev=140053707 to_ptr=140058625 rputrow_rowid=140083201 location=5 idprev=140774603 to_ptr=140779521 rputrow_rowid=140812289 location=5 idprev=142175435 to_ptr=142180353 rputrow_rowid=142196737 location=5 idprev=148008139 to_ptr=148013057 rputrow_rowid=148086785 location=5 idprev=154881227 to_ptr=154902529 rputrow_rowid=154918913 location=5 idprev=153980107 to_ptr=153985025 rputrow_rowid=154001409 location=5 idprev=164162763 to_ptr=164167681 rputrow_rowid=164192257 location=5 idprev=181005515 to_ptr=181010433 rputrow_rowid=181026817
