At 01:41 PM 4/16/2002 -0400, Dan Champion wrote:
>  I have reported the BUG to RDCC. Though I must say I am sorely
>disappointed. The same reports that I had to upgrade to 6.5++
>(which turns out didn't help a bit) can not be done with R:Base in
>its unfinished state.

Dan,

Yes, the "keep breakpoints" checkbox never accomplished much for 
me either. But like a lot of features, it's still there because if it were 
taken out, somebody's old reports would stop working.  

In my opinion, this is not really a bug, but a request for a new feature.  
One of the limitations of a "band oriented" report generator -- like the 
one in R:Base -- is that it processes one row, then prints it, then goes 
on to the next row. 

The feature you want -- to know if the next "group" will fit on the same 
page -- requires a look "ahead" in the data. Many people have come up 
with strategies to do this over the years. Unfortunately, they are all a 
little complicated and time consuming. Some involve a GROUP BY 
view that summaries the amount of data in  each group, and lookups in 
the report that check that view to determine how much space will be 
needed, as well as other expressions -- reset at the page break -- that 
keep track of how much of the page has already gone by. It took me a 
couple of days of programming to do a model like that for David M. 
Blocker's advanced reports book a few years ago, and I didn't respond 
to your question right away because I didn't really have time to go into 
all the details and document it all for you.  

If you email me a fax number privately, I'll fax you the three pages from 
a 1995 edition of David M. Blocker's Advanced Forms and Reports 
book that show a model for doing this in R:Base for DOS. (Presuming 
David gives me permission :-) )

But Dan, lighten up on RBTI, especially publicly.  You are thousands of 
times more likely to have RBTI attend to your personal requests for 
new features than you are with Microsoft. It's happened to many of us 
many many times over. (Maybe part of it is how you ask!) I certainly 
don't begrudge Razzak his efforts to get everybody up to date. I want 
RBTI to stay in business, because I like their products, and the more 
upgrade bucks they get, the more they can afford to keep these 
products improving.  And did you ever notice, that after his suggestion 
that you upgrade, he usually has a work-around for the older versions, 
too?

Bill




Bill



================================================
TO SEE MESSAGE POSTING GUIDELINES:
Send a plain text email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the message body, put just two words: INTRO rbase-l
================================================
TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the message body, put just two words: UNSUBSCRIBE rbase-l
================================================
TO SEARCH ARCHIVES:
http://www.mail-archive.com/rbase-l%40sonetmail.com/

Reply via email to