per drew's point, it is probably a 56 and the seller got confused when he looked up the current listings. i believe the 56cm has a slightly longer top-tube measurement (59 vs 57) if i'm reading the specs correctly. the current 58 is closer to the old 56.
On Thursday, November 19, 2015 at 5:23:04 PM UTC-5, Belopolsky wrote: > > Trying to make sense of this bike I bought. I am 5'7, I was told it was a > 55cm. I seem to fit it fine, if anything I am a bit stretched out on it so > I was thinking next season I'd get some pullback bars, but I digress.. > > Looking at the website again, I see that the 58+ comes with a double tt. > Was the 55 ever a double? I saw someone elsewhere online who had a 56cm > double.. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
