I disagree. I'm not a geometry expert by any means, but I can't think of any stock bike so... elongated. A 63cm virtual top tube and 485 mm chainstays on a what is essentially a med to med/large bike? I haven't seen any other specs beside that and the seat tube (50cm) but at first glance it appears to be low and loooooooong.
On Wednesday, April 13, 2016 at 11:05:33 AM UTC-4, Mark Reimer wrote: > > Yeah, it is kinda weird. It's also weird to me how very un-weird the frame > is as a whole, given how much Grant played up the weirdness these frames > would be. I was expecting something really...well...weird. What came out > feels like a pretty safe frame to me. This just reminds me of a prettier > Kona Humu. > > On Wednesday, April 13, 2016 at 9:50:21 AM UTC-5, Ryan Fleming wrote: >> >> I like the fork....but it sure feels a bit weird to see a tigged Riv. Not >> a criticism , just an observation >> >> On Wednesday, April 13, 2016 at 12:48:48 AM UTC-5, Joe Bernard wrote: >>> >>> The deposit link is up with pics of a silvery-blue prototype. It's cool! >> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
