The driving attendant had the accident. Violated the trust of oversight which was the promise predicating this experiment's permission to use public roads as its laboratory.
I'm (was) coming to grips with AI Ubers and have felt safer around them than transit busses whose operators continue to have either passive aggressive driving behavior or measurable incompetence that risks other legal occupants of the roadway. They don't learn and are also on extended experimentation. I have a shell jacket with a tear in the left arm from the side of a bus that was well on the way to successfully curbing me in broad daylight. Andy Cheatham Pittsburgh On Monday, March 19, 2018 at 6:58:21 PM UTC-4, Steve Palincsar wrote: > > > > On 03/19/2018 06:39 PM, Eric Norris wrote: > > By comparison, 5,376 pedestrians were killed by people-drive cars in > > 2015, which is one pedestrian killed every 1.6 hours. > > > > It’s not helpful to focus a single accident—this is a “man bites dog” > > story that triggers all sorts of worries about technology gone wrong. > > The facts, however, might indicate that, mile for mile, > > computer-driven cars are safer than people-driven. More research and > > work is needed, but overall I for one am hopeful for a future in which > > safer cars drive themselves. > > > > Since computer driven cars are basically still in the laboratory I think > it's premature to say they "are safer". They "aren't" anything at all > yet, just a lab experiment. > > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
