How fat a tire can a modern Fargo take? I owned an earlier model, and don't know if they have changed, but I don't think my earlier (2008?) model could.
Current specs say that Fargos except for XS* can take "29+" tires, but does 29" include true 3" or 80 mm? They don't say. But if the modern Ti Fargo can take 3" actual tires with sufficient air gap, it might be a very good replacement for the Monocog. 'Nother question: Would I be right in assuming that you can get a =/< 160 mm Q on a modern Fargo, particularly the ti Fargo? * Salsa says this is to avoid toe overlap. Wimps. Whoever let toe overlap interfere with a desired feature? Patrick "the Matthews 1:1 has-and-I'm-not-kidding 3" of toe overlap with 80 mm fenders, but I actually do understand others' hesitation" Moore On Sat, May 22, 2021 at 7:12 AM EricP <epericmpl...@gmail.com> wrote: > Well, I haven't been through the number of bicycles like I have musical > instruments, so there is not as much regret here. Possibly the one I think > about the most was an early Salsa Fargo. Was the bike I did my first > century on and also my only 100 mile gravel road race (where I was the > sweep). It could do anything. But in the end I was going away from drop > bars and wanted something else. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/CALuTfgufPkMOXq4J-nUdaaLACdMTxmADwzyVNd8gU90YWepiyA%40mail.gmail.com.
