> Are you contending that the double (or god forbid, triple) Why God forbid?
I like traditional diamond frames, but triple frames done right look swell. http://www.flickr.com/photos/retrotec-inglis-cycles/4561446951/ On May 6, 6:11 am, Steve Palincsar <palin...@his.com> wrote: > On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 22:46 -0700, happyriding wrote: > > On May 5, 9:42 pm, PATRICK MOORE <bertin...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I'm glad I got a 56 with the single tt. I can see any reason for two, > > > neither looks nor durability. Odd. > > > Maybe not on the 56, but as frames get larger they become more > > susceptible to shimmy. The 60 and above could be shimmy machines in > > the right conditions. And if you've ever experienced high speed > > shimmy, you will readily consider purchasing a triple top tube bike if > > it's offered. Hey, a Triple-pillar for 2011? > > Are you contending that the double (or god forbid, triple) top tube is > meant to prevent speed wobble? I'd like to see some evidence for that. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "RBW Owners Bunch" group. > To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
