> That being said, I personally like the look of double top tubes on the
> larger Bombadil.

Yes.

Big bikes without the double tube probably ride alright but look,
well, odd:

http://oswaldcycleworks.com/mcoswhole.jpg

On May 5, 4:56 pm, EricP <ericpl...@aol.com> wrote:
> Will agree with Steve here.  Have had my 56cm Sam Hillborne loaded up
> with 25 plus pounds of gear in panniers and rear rack and have had no
> noticable issues with frame flexiness.  Even a loaded Carradice Nelson
> Longflap doesn't seem to change the handling.  Other than weight shift
> of where the load is located.  Add to the fact that last year my
> weight was around 240.  So for my use, the Hillborne with a single
> tube (Singleborne?) is not under stiff.
>
> That being said, I personally like the look of double top tubes on the
> larger Bombadil.
>
> Eric Platt
> St. Paul, MN
>
> On May 5, 4:48 pm, Steve Palincsar <palin...@his.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 14:22 -0700, William wrote:
> > > The 2TT has almost nothing to do with strength and almost everything
> > > to do with stiffness under cargo load.
>
> > > A campeur didn't get extra tubes because Randonneurs were breaking
> > > their frames:
>
> > >http://www.flickr.com/photos/bicigirl/4037516334/
>
> > Yes, but the bike shown in that photo does not have two top tubes. It
> > has diagonal stays. I'm not sure I've ever seen a photo of a campeur
> > with two top tubes.
>
> > > A stiffer frame just responds to load better.
>
> > If a double top tube was needed to make a heavy duty camping bike, I'm
> > pretty sure Bruce Gordon and Bilenky would be using them on their
> > camping (i.e., loaded touring) bikes.
>
> > The only double top tubes I can recall (other than these new Rivendells)
> > are roadsters and newsboy bikes, and in the case of the newsboy bikes I
> > think the double top tube existed chiefly to provide something to attach
> > the "tanks" to.
>
> > > My 56 Hillborne is
> > > really floppy when my saddlesack Large is stuffed and I'm out of the
> > > saddle. The whole frame twists from that rocking load.
>
> > Maybe you ought to get some kind of saddle bag support or rack to attach
> > that flopping bag to.
>
> > > If you never
> > > load the Sam with cargo, you'll likely never notice and never need
> > > it.
>
> > A flopping saddle bag isn't at all the same thing as well secured
> > panniers attached to a sturdy rear rack.
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> > "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> > For more options, visit this group 
> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
> To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group 
> athttp://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.

Reply via email to