Perhaps not a bummer at all! $1250 suggests double-top-tube. Gives the OP a choice of a less pricey, slightly-shorter theoretical top tube length (though it isn't clear to me how much difference it would make).
If the original consideration was a Hunqapillar, then $1250 is less than that, let alone a Bombadil. Obviously, Sam isn't a *close* substitute for either Hunqapillar or Bombadil... not as strong, less tire clearance... May not be what the OP seeks. Yours, Thomas Lynn Skean On Oct 29, 2010, at 4:33 PM, Garth <garth...@gmail.com> wrote: > A 64cm. Bombadil may fit you, it depends on how long you need your TT > to be. The Bombadil is notable longer. > > BTW, the 64cm. Sam frame on the web site is $1250, not $1000. Bummer. > Keven told me it had not been updated. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "RBW Owners Bunch" group. > To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
