My favorite is the old Shimano Ultegra/600 post. simple, functional, looks good, and lightweight. The only problem is that a NOS post goes for almost $100 on ebay, etc.
On Mar 3, 8:15 pm, Michael_S <mikeybi...@rocketmail.com> wrote: > man that Paul post is very nice. Any input on the setback? It looks > huge. Looking foward to more info. > > ~Mike > > On Mar 3, 3:39 pm, bfd <bfd...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mar 3, 12:48 pm, Bruce <fullylug...@yahoo.com> wrote:> --- On Thu, > > 3/3/11, omnigrid <omnig...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > From: omnigrid <omnig...@gmail.com> > > > Subject: Re: [RBW] Re: Best non-Nitto/VO seatpost? > > > To: rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com > > > Date: Thursday, March 3, 2011, 10:24 AM > > > > I disagree about thomson being "the best made, most reliable seatpost on > > > the planet." They are great, but not the best for all applications. > > > > I'd always go with cold-forged than cnd'ed any day. And Thomsons dont > > > work well with brooks or other leather saddles with short rails, unless > > > you get the gross setback version. but on the cnd'd front, paul comp has > > > a new seatpost with massive setback. > > > Agree, I prefer Campy or Dura Ace seatpost over Thomsons as I have an > > older DA AX post on one bike and a Campy ti post on another. I also > > have a surprising strong, but heavy kalloy. Don't get me wrong, > > Thomson makes a nice post, but it isn't *better made* or *more > > reliable* than Campy or DA. Good Luck! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
