on 4/17/11 11:25 AM, Jeremy Till at jeremy.t...@gmail.com wrote: > I'd ride one. I wonder if a 59 or a 63 would fit me better.
Yeah, I'm actually a bit curious as to how the specific sizing on this bicycle will turn out. I've ridden one, and it was a pretty spritely little beast. http://ramblings.cyclofiend.com/?p=431 http://www.flickr.com/photos/cyclofiend/4468312567/ It was a 54(55?), and I'm ~5'11", riding a 58 Quickbeam and a 59 Hilsen. It was a touch small feeling when I first got on it, but worked OK. I'd probably want to try both. As far as the second top tube...man, that feature does seem to divide folks into camps... ;^) There's no appreciable difference in weight, IMO. If you've ever hefted a light tapered tube, you'll know what I mean. And, since the frame _is_ built with lighter tubing and higher clearances (certainly more than the Ramboulliet, which got cited as not needing a 2TT), maybe it does make a difference when the triangles get big and stresses accumulate. I'll reserve judgement until I ride one of them. - J -- Jim Edgar cyclofi...@earthlink.net Could you take a moment to vote for me? I am entered in a audiobook contest which is initially determined by public voting - if you could go here - http://tinyurl.com/vote-jimedgar register on the Bookperk site and vote for my read - http://tinyurl.com/vote-jimedgar - I'd really appreciate it. You can vote one time each day until early May. Vote early, vote often! Thanks! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
