Go with the sackville. I've have both. I've lost my wallet with my carradice side pockets on a ride from marin. I've had to juryrig my carradice when I would ride without fenders. My sackville is much more versatile. Very well thought out.
On Dec 14, 10:30 pm, René Sterental <orthie...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have both bags, actually all three, don't ask why. I use them all with > the Nitto R-14 rack. The Carradice rests on the rack but sags on both sides > around it. I can also feel the edges of the top behind the saddle with my > butt. Both Sackville SaddleSacks become invisible (I don't feel them at > all) when on the bike and I like them both, but of the two, I've fallen in > love with the large one that I now use for commuting. > > I like the Carradice for leisure rides because of the two side pockets but > feel it is less practical for commuting. Haven't tried using it without the > anitto rear rack. It also goes very well with my Nitto Big Rear smaller > rack, which I can use on the Hunqapillar de to the higher placed seat stay > braze-on which in turn allow the rack to fall right below the saddle loops. > The larger version falls behind the saddle loops and the top section > interferes with the bottom of the SaddleSacks. > > If I had to choose only one and give the others away, I'd probably stay > with the large SaddleSack. If I only could have two, I'd add the Carradice > Camper. > > Hope this helps, > > René -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
