It may not have the resolution of a standard camera, but it's worth the $$ to me just to have the technology. This is unlike any camera that has even been available to the public since ... well, since the advent of photography. I find that irresistible (and, by the way, I'll be at the local Apple Store next Friday to pick up the "new" iPad (3)
--Eric N On Mar 10, 2012, at 8:31 PM, Seth Vidal wrote: > On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 11:11 PM, Philip Williamson > <philip.william...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I've gone back and forth on the value of the Lytro, so I'm interested >> to see more pics. I really want it to be more than a novelty, but I >> haven't seen that yet. I think we're going to see software upgrades >> for existing cameras that give 90% of the refocusability at 10x the >> resolution. >> > > I think you've got it right. The lytro is more or less an > infinite-focus polaroid given the size and depth of picture you end up > with. > > -sv > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "RBW Owners Bunch" group. > To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
