With all due respect, Jan, that is a highly dubious assertion that 105 
cranks will cost less per mile than Ultegra cranks. The MSRP difference in 
the crank is $100 ($360 for Ultegra and $260 for 105), If you assume the 
chainrings to be the primary wear item, you could buy the 105 crank and 
spend the extra $100 on some new (supposedly more durable) Ultegra rings to 
use when the 105 rings wear out. Now we're at the same price, and we've got 
two sets of chainrings for the less costly crank. That to me sounds like 
the 105 crank will give more miles for the same dollars. Of course, there's 
the probability that the cranks themselves could break, but that 
probability is slim with either model. How to compare two very small 
probabilities and translate it usefully to dollars/mile?

That an old Peugeot was costly to maintain is not too surprising. Those 
things are money pits. Would an equivalently priced, say, Miyata with Sun 
Tour parts, of the same vintage, have been less costly to maintain? I think 
yes, all else being equal, and barring crashes, and other mishaps. I can 
point at numerous Schwinn Varsities and similar machines that have been 
abused in many ways by many people for 40 years, and they're still on the 
road. Arguably, the Varsity is cheap for other reasons, but durability 
isn't one of them.

Anyway, I suspect the dollars to durability correlation to be a weak 
correlation at best, and impossible to discern in the real world. This is 
the kind of overly simplistic thing you read in an article in Bicycling 
that attempts to give first-timers some basic knowledge to buy a first road 
bike. But even Bicycling doesn't have the audacity to make a definitive 
claim in terms of dollars per mile. 

I agree that a crummy bike will be less enjoyable and will need repairs, 
but 105 parts are far from crummy.



On Thursday, May 31, 2012 10:48:49 AM UTC-5, Jan Heine wrote:
>
> On May 31, 6:03 am, Steven Frederick <stl...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> > It's interesting how people prioritize bike build budget money.  Lot's 
> of 
> > Riv's proudly roll with fairly low-mid range yet functional parts, 
> Sugino 
> > cranks, 105 derailers, Tektro brakes. And I see a lot of Surly's with CK 
> > headsets and various high-end bits. "Bike Bling." 
>
> I think a lot depends on how much you ride. 105 parts will be more 
> expensive than Ultegra in the long run, if you ride more than 2000 
> miles a year. Quality components offer better durability and/or 
> improved performance - for example, a high-end crank with narrower 
> tread (Q factor) and harder-wearing chainrings will be more enjoyable 
> and not much more expensive in the long-run than a cheap Sugino crank 
> with soft chainrings. 
>
> I learned this early-on. My mid-range Peugeot 10-speed ended up being 
> the most expensive bike I ever owned, per mile. Once I started riding 
> seriously, it needed repairs and replacements almost weekly. When I 
> switched to a custom frame with Campagnolo components, which cost 
> three times as much to buy, my per-mile cost went way down. At the 
> same time, my enjoyment of cycling went way up. It can be a win-win 
> situation, once you get over the sticker shock. 
>
> Jan Heine 
> Editor 
> Bicycle Quarterly 
> http://www.bikequarterly.com 
>
> Follow our blog at http://janheine.wordpress.com/ 
>

On Thursday, May 31, 2012 10:48:49 AM UTC-5, Jan Heine wrote:
>
> On May 31, 6:03 am, Steven Frederick <stl...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> > It's interesting how people prioritize bike build budget money.  Lot's 
> of 
> > Riv's proudly roll with fairly low-mid range yet functional parts, 
> Sugino 
> > cranks, 105 derailers, Tektro brakes. And I see a lot of Surly's with CK 
> > headsets and various high-end bits. "Bike Bling." 
>
> I think a lot depends on how much you ride. 105 parts will be more 
> expensive than Ultegra in the long run, if you ride more than 2000 
> miles a year. Quality components offer better durability and/or 
> improved performance - for example, a high-end crank with narrower 
> tread (Q factor) and harder-wearing chainrings will be more enjoyable 
> and not much more expensive in the long-run than a cheap Sugino crank 
> with soft chainrings. 
>
> I learned this early-on. My mid-range Peugeot 10-speed ended up being 
> the most expensive bike I ever owned, per mile. Once I started riding 
> seriously, it needed repairs and replacements almost weekly. When I 
> switched to a custom frame with Campagnolo components, which cost 
> three times as much to buy, my per-mile cost went way down. At the 
> same time, my enjoyment of cycling went way up. It can be a win-win 
> situation, once you get over the sticker shock. 
>
> Jan Heine 
> Editor 
> Bicycle Quarterly 
> http://www.bikequarterly.com 
>
> Follow our blog at http://janheine.wordpress.com/ 
>

On Thursday, May 31, 2012 10:48:49 AM UTC-5, Jan Heine wrote:
>
> On May 31, 6:03 am, Steven Frederick <stl...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> > It's interesting how people prioritize bike build budget money.  Lot's 
> of 
> > Riv's proudly roll with fairly low-mid range yet functional parts, 
> Sugino 
> > cranks, 105 derailers, Tektro brakes. And I see a lot of Surly's with CK 
> > headsets and various high-end bits. "Bike Bling." 
>
> I think a lot depends on how much you ride. 105 parts will be more 
> expensive than Ultegra in the long run, if you ride more than 2000 
> miles a year. Quality components offer better durability and/or 
> improved performance - for example, a high-end crank with narrower 
> tread (Q factor) and harder-wearing chainrings will be more enjoyable 
> and not much more expensive in the long-run than a cheap Sugino crank 
> with soft chainrings. 
>
> I learned this early-on. My mid-range Peugeot 10-speed ended up being 
> the most expensive bike I ever owned, per mile. Once I started riding 
> seriously, it needed repairs and replacements almost weekly. When I 
> switched to a custom frame with Campagnolo components, which cost 
> three times as much to buy, my per-mile cost went way down. At the 
> same time, my enjoyment of cycling went way up. It can be a win-win 
> situation, once you get over the sticker shock. 
>
> Jan Heine 
> Editor 
> Bicycle Quarterly 
> http://www.bikequarterly.com 
>
> Follow our blog at http://janheine.wordpress.com/ 
>

On Thursday, May 31, 2012 10:48:49 AM UTC-5, Jan Heine wrote:
>
> On May 31, 6:03 am, Steven Frederick <stl...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> > It's interesting how people prioritize bike build budget money.  Lot's 
> of 
> > Riv's proudly roll with fairly low-mid range yet functional parts, 
> Sugino 
> > cranks, 105 derailers, Tektro brakes. And I see a lot of Surly's with CK 
> > headsets and various high-end bits. "Bike Bling." 
>
> I think a lot depends on how much you ride. 105 parts will be more 
> expensive than Ultegra in the long run, if you ride more than 2000 
> miles a year. Quality components offer better durability and/or 
> improved performance - for example, a high-end crank with narrower 
> tread (Q factor) and harder-wearing chainrings will be more enjoyable 
> and not much more expensive in the long-run than a cheap Sugino crank 
> with soft chainrings. 
>
> I learned this early-on. My mid-range Peugeot 10-speed ended up being 
> the most expensive bike I ever owned, per mile. Once I started riding 
> seriously, it needed repairs and replacements almost weekly. When I 
> switched to a custom frame with Campagnolo components, which cost 
> three times as much to buy, my per-mile cost went way down. At the 
> same time, my enjoyment of cycling went way up. It can be a win-win 
> situation, once you get over the sticker shock. 
>
> Jan Heine 
> Editor 
> Bicycle Quarterly 
> http://www.bikequarterly.com 
>
> Follow our blog at http://janheine.wordpress.com/ 
>

On Thursday, May 31, 2012 10:48:49 AM UTC-5, Jan Heine wrote:
>
> On May 31, 6:03 am, Steven Frederick <stl...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> > It's interesting how people prioritize bike build budget money.  Lot's 
> of 
> > Riv's proudly roll with fairly low-mid range yet functional parts, 
> Sugino 
> > cranks, 105 derailers, Tektro brakes. And I see a lot of Surly's with CK 
> > headsets and various high-end bits. "Bike Bling." 
>
> I think a lot depends on how much you ride. 105 parts will be more 
> expensive than Ultegra in the long run, if you ride more than 2000 
> miles a year. Quality components offer better durability and/or 
> improved performance - for example, a high-end crank with narrower 
> tread (Q factor) and harder-wearing chainrings will be more enjoyable 
> and not much more expensive in the long-run than a cheap Sugino crank 
> with soft chainrings. 
>
> I learned this early-on. My mid-range Peugeot 10-speed ended up being 
> the most expensive bike I ever owned, per mile. Once I started riding 
> seriously, it needed repairs and replacements almost weekly. When I 
> switched to a custom frame with Campagnolo components, which cost 
> three times as much to buy, my per-mile cost went way down. At the 
> same time, my enjoyment of cycling went way up. It can be a win-win 
> situation, once you get over the sticker shock. 
>
> Jan Heine 
> Editor 
> Bicycle Quarterly 
> http://www.bikequarterly.com 
>
> Follow our blog at http://janheine.wordpress.com/ 
>

On Thursday, May 31, 2012 10:48:49 AM UTC-5, Jan Heine wrote:
>
> On May 31, 6:03 am, Steven Frederick <stl...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> > It's interesting how people prioritize bike build budget money.  Lot's 
> of 
> > Riv's proudly roll with fairly low-mid range yet functional parts, 
> Sugino 
> > cranks, 105 derailers, Tektro brakes. And I see a lot of Surly's with CK 
> > headsets and various high-end bits. "Bike Bling." 
>
> I think a lot depends on how much you ride. 105 parts will be more 
> expensive than Ultegra in the long run, if you ride more than 2000 
> miles a year. Quality components offer better durability and/or 
> improved performance - for example, a high-end crank with narrower 
> tread (Q factor) and harder-wearing chainrings will be more enjoyable 
> and not much more expensive in the long-run than a cheap Sugino crank 
> with soft chainrings. 
>
> I learned this early-on. My mid-range Peugeot 10-speed ended up being 
> the most expensive bike I ever owned, per mile. Once I started riding 
> seriously, it needed repairs and replacements almost weekly. When I 
> switched to a custom frame with Campagnolo components, which cost 
> three times as much to buy, my per-mile cost went way down. At the 
> same time, my enjoyment of cycling went way up. It can be a win-win 
> situation, once you get over the sticker shock. 
>
> Jan Heine 
> Editor 
> Bicycle Quarterly 
> http://www.bikequarterly.com 
>
> Follow our blog at http://janheine.wordpress.com/ 
>

On Thursday, May 31, 2012 10:48:49 AM UTC-5, Jan Heine wrote:
>
> On May 31, 6:03 am, Steven Frederick <stl...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> > It's interesting how people prioritize bike build budget money.  Lot's 
> of 
> > Riv's proudly roll with fairly low-mid range yet functional parts, 
> Sugino 
> > cranks, 105 derailers, Tektro brakes. And I see a lot of Surly's with CK 
> > headsets and various high-end bits. "Bike Bling." 
>
> I think a lot depends on how much you ride. 105 parts will be more 
> expensive than Ultegra in the long run, if you ride more than 2000 
> miles a year. Quality components offer better durability and/or 
> improved performance - for example, a high-end crank with narrower 
> tread (Q factor) and harder-wearing chainrings will be more enjoyable 
> and not much more expensive in the long-run than a cheap Sugino crank 
> with soft chainrings. 
>
> I learned this early-on. My mid-range Peugeot 10-speed ended up being 
> the most expensive bike I ever owned, per mile. Once I started riding 
> seriously, it needed repairs and replacements almost weekly. When I 
> switched to a custom frame with Campagnolo components, which cost 
> three times as much to buy, my per-mile cost went way down. At the 
> same time, my enjoyment of cycling went way up. It can be a win-win 
> situation, once you get over the sticker shock. 
>
> Jan Heine 
> Editor 
> Bicycle Quarterly 
> http://www.bikequarterly.com 
>
> Follow our blog at http://janheine.wordpress.com/ 
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/cxFx2cBgKL4J.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.

Reply via email to