It's certainly true that there's seldom, if ever, a "screaming need for discs". But we're pretty far down the road past "screaming need" for ANY of the gadgetry we chat about in this forum. I personally know a number of people who do not consider worthwhile any bike innovation that isn't included on a 1950s English 3sp. I've ridden old 3-speeds plenty, and I see the charm, but occasionally I think the technologies developed over the ensuing half-century have earned a place in my 21st Century bicycle-centric life.
IMO, a sturdy, fat-tire Riv with capability to handle BOTH cantilevers/v-brakes and discs would be a neat thing - sort of a prettier functional-equivalent to the Surly Troll or Ogre. I think it would broaden the appeal to potential customers who appreciate Riv's aesthetic stylings and general approach, but aren't committed to using the same types of parts mountain bikers were stuck with 25 years ago. Obviously, the true retro connoisseurs will scoff at the superfluous disc brake tabs they'd never use in a million years, but the scoffers will be offset by those who'll embrace the added versatility. I count myself among the "embracers of versatility", by the way. I'm not saying disc brakes are 100% necessary at all, but some concession to modernity and, more importantly, diversity in the product line, would seem to be a good thing for Riv. Otherwise, it seems like we'll have another heavy-duty Riv frame that competes for the same seemingly limited pool of customers who are considering the Atlantis, Hunqapillar, Bombadil, Hillborne, etc. Something as simple as disc tabs would be a standout among the excellent, but overlapping frames that are already available, and would, I think, make a splash among a whole new pool of potential customers. On Wednesday, September 5, 2012 4:04:45 PM UTC-5, Matthew J wrote: > > Seems to me for a budget bike that is almost certainly would be heavier > than the upmarket Rivs, discs will mean extra weight and expense with > little benefit for most riders. > > Most people ride on pavement or hard pack trails and then usually when the > weather is fine. In those conditions, decent rim brakes provide all the > stopping power any rider will ever need. Some ride on pavement in inclement > weather where discs have some advantages over rims. But not so much that > there is a screaming need for discs. > > Discs are markedly better off road and on long distance adventure > touring. Neither Riv's niche. > > On Wednesday, September 5, 2012 12:42:00 PM UTC-5, Jim Thill - Hiawatha > Cyclery wrote: > >> It seems moderately necessary to point out that there's nothing specific >> to a frame that's made for hydraulic disc brakes that is different than on >> a frame made for cable disc brakes. Therefore, IF Riv makes a bike for disc >> brakes, which seems only a tiny bit likely IMO, there's no need for any of >> us to be forced into one type of brake or another. >> >> I like hydraulic brakes. I've been using several models of Avid >> hydraulics for about 3 years now, and I've never had one single problem >> with them. They are, for all practical purposes, self-adjusting and never >> seem to make any superfluous noise. It is true, however, that using >> hydraulic brakes does limit brake lever options. Think of the hydraulic >> brake/lever as a single unit, rather than the mix and match experience of >> cable-actuated systems. This is a mix-and-match-centric group, I realize. >> >> On Tuesday, September 4, 2012 9:37:17 PM UTC-5, Montclair BobbyB wrote: >>> >>> Or hydraulic brakes... I've been riding both cable and hydraulic disc >>> brakes for years, and I'm here to tell you, hydraulic Shimano's (the older >>> style) are the bee's knees... I've never had issues with busted brake lines >>> or poor performance... They're easy to maintain and super dependable, way >>> more dependable than rim brakes! And even the best-adjusted cable-actuated >>> disc brakes can't come close to the hydraulics. The price has come way >>> down on hydraulic brakes... there are few reasons left to go with cable >>> discs... I've been running them on my mountain bikes for years in all kinds >>> of rought weather conditions (including ice and snow). THEY STOP in all >>> kinds of weather! >>> >>> I'd love to see a disc version Rivendell...although I fear it would >>> require a beefier fork (for the forces applied to the lower section of the >>> fork). This might be a challenge to make a beefier fork that looks >>> elegant. Then again, I'll bet it's possible to preserve the beauty in a >>> disc version.. Wes Williams (for example) makes a beautifully curved 29er >>> disc fork (the Willits WOW). I love the look of rim brakes, but >>> performance wise there's simply no contest between rim and disc brakes. >>> >>> Peace, >>> BB >>> >>> On Monday, September 3, 2012 5:53:11 PM UTC-4, James Warren wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> I would like it if this bike were made ready for disc brakes. >>>> Mechanical ones. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/-y9pfioql6gJ. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
