This goes back to the earlier thread on padded vs. not padded shorts. If you are one of those who are fine without padding, the MUSA shorts, knickers and pants are great for the reasons the others point out above. They are well made, breathe, and the seamless crotch works. Some people cannot ride distance without padding. MUSA don't help there.
On Sunday, August 18, 2013 11:12:05 PM UTC-5, Michael wrote: > > Everyone seems to love them for their biking comfort. > > I am not particularly comfortable cycling in everyday shorts or sweatpants > on bikes (though 98% of my riding is done in them), > so I don't see how the MUSA's will be an improvement for me. > Am I missing something? > > I would like to experience the benefits you all are getting from them. > But before dropping the serious coin on them, need more info about what > makes them better than any other regular pants. > Thanks for your help. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
