no offense Michael, I think Grant can safely argue the Sugino double and triples he offers, along with chainring options will get you about anywhere. Yes, there are flashier aesthetic options, but he doesn't need to inventory those.
My next bike is going to have a compact double and a wide rear to go with it. I know to cover everything I want to ride on one bike, I need a gear below 30" and nice to have about a 100" gear to light your hair going downhill. 11-32 9 speed rear with 44/34 up front will get me everywhere I want to go. The big chainring alone starts below 40 inches, and the mid-range steps are 6-7" With 6 or 7-speed rear, a triple front makes for a very useful bike. On Monday, December 2, 2013 7:06:11 AM UTC-6, Michael Hechmer wrote: > > I have found a 16 tooth difference between rings unsatisfactory on two > counts. First, when I shift between rings, the next gear I am looking for > is somewhere at the other end of the cluster, and the wider the range of > the cluster the more difficult it is to find that gear. A lot of momentum > is lost on hills while I search for it. Second, front detailers will shift > 16 teeth, but they don't really like it and tend to do it slowly. More > momentum loss. I have found better ways to get a wider range double > without these problems. First option is a 48/34, which will shift much > faster and put the next gear exactly two cogs away. The 12/48 is plenty > big enough for everything short of hi end field sprints. Better yet is a > 44/30 with an 11-28 cluster. the 44/11 is the same as a 48/12 and the > 30/28 is only a half gear higher that 34/34. This combination offers a > cleaner shifting pattern and more closely spaced gears. I also find I > actually have less need to shift the front at all, although my Campy > derailler does it so effortlessly that I never hesitate. I have also found > that this combination works very well with the new Shimano RD short cage, > which greatly improves friction shifting. I am using the White VCB crank > on my Ram and really like it, but you can also get a 44/30 with a number of > cranks that offer 94 spiders - DaVinci sells one (made by White Ind) and of > course the beautiful, but expensive TA Carmina. I wish RBW offered a good, > sensible compact double. (hint, hint) > > Michael > > On Friday, November 29, 2013 4:24:27 PM UTC-5, Tom Virgil wrote: >> >> <http://interlocracing.com/defiant_double_130bcd1500.jpg> >> >> Interloc website <http://interlocracing.com/cranks.html> >> Any experience or guidance on this crankset. The alternative is a Sugino >> Alpina compact. >> >> Here is the VeloORANGE take >> <http://velo-orange.blogspot.com/2010/11/grand-cru-110-or-alpina.html>on >> their VO branded variant versus the Aplina. >> >> Thanks >> >> Tom >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
