> It is useful if you actually send us what you tried to compile, hoiw it > failed, why you though it would work, etc ...
Sorry. My primary goal for the night was the doc; by the end, I wasn't sure which were the useful reject attempts. I'll try to be more specific in the future. > You cannot have missing arguments "in the middle" in C++. I'll meditate on this. The sugar is always in the first position for the stats functions, correct? best, xian _______________________________________________ Rcpp-devel mailing list Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
