Le 07/12/10 14:11, Christian Gunning a écrit :
It is useful if you actually send us what you tried to compile, hoiw it
failed, why you though it would work, etc ...
Sorry. My primary goal for the night was the doc; by the end, I
wasn't sure which were the useful reject attempts. I'll try to be more
specific in the future.
Your contributions are useful. It helps us understanding how people from
outside the team use Rcpp.
You cannot have missing arguments "in the middle" in C++.
I'll meditate on this.
The sugar is always in the first position for the stats functions, correct?
Not sure what you mean by this.
--
Romain Francois
Professional R Enthusiast
+33(0) 6 28 91 30 30
http://romainfrancois.blog.free.fr
|- http://bit.ly/fT2rZM : highlight 0.2-5
|- http://bit.ly/gpCSpH : Evolution of Rcpp code size
`- http://bit.ly/hovakS : RcppGSL initial release
_______________________________________________
Rcpp-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
