Hi Romain, Dirk, all, Thanks for the quick replies. I think the list problem was due to a change in my gmail address (from "googlemail"); still puzzling that I didn't get a warning.
Hopefully someone can figure out why a function that returned an arma matrix has now become a vector: I've posted a minimal package on dropbox, https://dl.dropbox.com/u/352834/cda_1.2.1.tar.gz with a test in inst/testing that used to return a 3x3 matrix (Euler rotation), now a vector after the Rcpp update. The lesson for me is that I should really get into a proper testing framework. In the meantime, I'll be writing a few tests with Hadley's testthat. All the best, baptiste On 17 November 2012 11:20, Romain Francois <[email protected]> wrote: > First time I see this email. > > Sorry your package does not work. > > R CMD check --no-vignettes worked. (this is how I tested), but indeed > something in the vignette makes it crash. I guess I should check the > vignettes too :/ > > I get an error in demo(dimer_linear) > > regarding something that does not look like it is related to Rcpp, in this > mdply call : > > comparison <- mdply(params, onedimer, .progress="none") > > Not sure what the next steps are ... > > Romain > > Le 16/11/12 22:56, baptiste auguie a écrit : > >> Hi, >> >> Forwarded to you directly just in case it never makes it to the list for >> whatever reason (shouldn't I get an error message if it it is bounced?) >> >> Best, >> >> baptiste >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: *baptiste auguie* <[email protected] >> <mailto:baptiste.auguie@gmail.**com <[email protected]>>> >> Date: 17 November 2012 09:29 >> Subject: Fwd: latest incompatible changes for package developers? >> To: rcpp-devel >> <[email protected].**ac.at<[email protected]> >> <mailto:[email protected]**wien.ac.at<[email protected]> >> >> >> >> >> Not sure what happened to this email I sent yesterday; I can't find it >> in the list archives? >> >> Thanks, >> b. >> >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: *baptiste auguie* <[email protected] >> <mailto:baptiste.auguie@gmail.**com <[email protected]>>> >> Date: 16 November 2012 09:18 >> Subject: latest incompatible changes for package developers? >> To: rcpp-devel >> <[email protected]**project.org<[email protected]> >> <mailto:[email protected]**forge.r-project.org<[email protected]> >> >> >> >> >> Dear list, >> >> I haven't yet had time to read much about the new exciting changes >> introduced in Rcpp 0.10, but I got an email from B. Ripley this morning >> warning me that my cda package* was broken as a result of this CRAN >> update. It uses modules and RcppArmadillo. >> Indeed, a quick glance at the broken demos after having updated the >> package suggest that most if not all my functions are currently broken. >> Is there a specific document I should read first to speed up this >> recovery and be compatible with the new version? How much change should >> I expect? >> >> Thanks. >> All the best, >> >> baptiste >> >> * https://github.com/baptiste/**cda <https://github.com/baptiste/cda> >> http://cran.r-project.org/web/**packages/cda/index.html<http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/cda/index.html> >> >> >> > > -- > Romain Francois > Professional R Enthusiast > +33(0) 6 28 91 30 30 > > R Graph Gallery: > http://gallery.r-enthusiasts.**com<http://gallery.r-enthusiasts.com> > `- http://bit.ly/SweN1Z : SuperStorm Sandy > > blog: > http://romainfrancois.blog.**free.fr<http://romainfrancois.blog.free.fr> > |- http://bit.ly/RE6sYH : OOP with Rcpp modules > `- http://bit.ly/Thw7IK : Rcpp modules more flexible > >
_______________________________________________ Rcpp-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
