Le 16/11/12 23:51, baptiste auguie a écrit :
Hi Romain, Dirk, all,

Thanks for the quick replies. I think the list problem was due to a
change in my gmail address (from "googlemail"); still puzzling that I
didn't get a warning.

Hopefully someone can figure out why a function that returned an arma
matrix has now become a vector: I've posted a minimal package on dropbox,

https://dl.dropbox.com/u/352834/cda_1.2.1.tar.gz

with a test in inst/testing that used to return a 3x3 matrix (Euler
rotation), now a vector after the Rcpp update.


The lesson for me is that I should really get into a proper testing
framework. In the meantime, I'll be writing a few tests with Hadley's
testthat.

All the best,

baptiste

I'm looking at this issue now. Thanks for providing the example with euler. This is helpful.

On 17 November 2012 11:20, Romain Francois <rom...@r-enthusiasts.com
<mailto:rom...@r-enthusiasts.com>> wrote:

    First time I see this email.

    Sorry your package does not work.

    R CMD check --no-vignettes worked. (this is how I tested), but
    indeed something in the vignette makes it crash. I guess I should
    check the vignettes too :/

    I get an error in demo(dimer_linear)

    regarding something that does not look like it is related to Rcpp,
    in this mdply call :

         comparison <- mdply(params, onedimer, .progress="none")

    Not sure what the next steps are ...

    Romain

    Le 16/11/12 22:56, baptiste auguie a écrit :

        Hi,

        Forwarded to you directly just in case it never makes it to the
        list for
        whatever reason (shouldn't I get an error message if it it is
        bounced?)

        Best,

        baptiste

        ---------- Forwarded message ----------
        From: *baptiste auguie* <baptiste.aug...@gmail.com
        <mailto:baptiste.aug...@gmail.com>
        <mailto:baptiste.auguie@gmail.__com
        <mailto:baptiste.aug...@gmail.com>>>
        Date: 17 November 2012 09:29
        Subject: Fwd: latest incompatible changes for package developers?
        To: rcpp-devel <rcpp-de...@r-forge.wu-wien.__ac.at
        <mailto:rcpp-de...@r-forge.wu-wien.ac.at>
        <mailto:rcpp-de...@r-forge.wu-__wien.ac.at
        <mailto:rcpp-de...@r-forge.wu-wien.ac.at>>>


        Not sure what happened to this email I sent yesterday; I can't
        find it
        in the list archives?

        Thanks,
        b.


        ---------- Forwarded message ----------
        From: *baptiste auguie* <baptiste.aug...@gmail.com
        <mailto:baptiste.aug...@gmail.com>
        <mailto:baptiste.auguie@gmail.__com
        <mailto:baptiste.aug...@gmail.com>>>
        Date: 16 November 2012 09:18
        Subject: latest incompatible changes for package developers?
        To: rcpp-devel <rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-__project.org
        <mailto:rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org>
        <mailto:rcpp-devel@lists.r-__forge.r-project.org
        <mailto:rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org>>>


        Dear list,

        I haven't yet had time to read much about the new exciting changes
        introduced in Rcpp 0.10, but I got an email from B. Ripley this
        morning
        warning me that my cda package* was broken as a result of this CRAN
        update. It uses modules and RcppArmadillo.
        Indeed, a quick glance at the broken demos after having updated the
        package suggest that most if not all my functions are currently
        broken.
        Is there a specific document I should read first to speed up this
        recovery and be compatible with the new version? How much change
        should
        I expect?

        Thanks.
        All the best,

        baptiste

        * https://github.com/baptiste/__cda
        <https://github.com/baptiste/cda>
        http://cran.r-project.org/web/__packages/cda/index.html
        <http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/cda/index.html>




    --
    Romain Francois
    Professional R Enthusiast
    +33(0) 6 28 91 30 30 <tel:%2B33%280%29%206%2028%2091%2030%2030>

    R Graph Gallery: http://gallery.r-enthusiasts.__com
    <http://gallery.r-enthusiasts.com>
    `- http://bit.ly/SweN1Z : SuperStorm Sandy

    blog: http://romainfrancois.blog.__free.fr
    <http://romainfrancois.blog.free.fr>
    |- http://bit.ly/RE6sYH : OOP with Rcpp modules
    `- http://bit.ly/Thw7IK : Rcpp modules more flexible




--
Romain Francois
Professional R Enthusiast
+33(0) 6 28 91 30 30

R Graph Gallery: http://gallery.r-enthusiasts.com
`- http://bit.ly/SweN1Z : SuperStorm Sandy

blog:            http://romainfrancois.blog.free.fr
|- http://bit.ly/RE6sYH : OOP with Rcpp modules
`- http://bit.ly/Thw7IK : Rcpp modules more flexible

_______________________________________________
Rcpp-devel mailing list
Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org
https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel

Reply via email to