I understand now. 76mm is the same as a Sherman cannon, so will you be  
able to use a marker?

—Mike Måne

Message sent by way of mobile device

On Aug 14, 2009, at 3:00 PM, Derek Engelhaupt <[email protected]> wrote:

> I was looking at the Saladin turret here:  
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:M113_FSV.JPG
>
> Just because it has the larger 76mm gun in it.  Then I was looking  
> at a plain top like the troop carrier.  That way I could interchange  
> the tops depending on the mission requirements.  Having the flat  
> top, I could easily put a mount on the top of it or remove the  
> turret, leave the turret ring intact and attach a camera to the  
> turret ring.  I have an underwater enclosure for my Sony HD video  
> camera to keep it safe from paintball goo.
>
> Derek
> T065
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Mike Måne <[email protected]> wr 
> ote:
> Excellent work! That looks like it can run very fast in the desert!  
> (I wouldn't want that thing ramming into my shins at full throttle.)  
> What are your plans for the top of the APC? I know some variants  
> have a rifle turret like a Bradley:
>
> http://www.armyrecognition.com/images/stories/oceania/australia/light_armoured/m113as4/pictures/M113_light_armoured_personnel_carrier_Australian_Army_003.jpg
>
> Perhaps a turret could be used to hold a video camera for recording  
> battle?
>
> -Mike M.
>
> 2009/8/13 Derek Engelhaupt <[email protected]>
> Whoops, here's the link:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d7dfrddGMOI
>
> Derek
> T065
>
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 9:36 PM, Derek Engelhaupt <[email protected]>  
> wrote:
> Well, the video is up...don't laugh at my crude editing skills. :)   
> First time I ever tried to edit
> a video I've taken with my Sony HD video camera.  Click on the HD  
> button for best viewing
> resolution.
>
> Derek
> T065
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Derek Engelhaupt <[email protected]>  
> wrote:
> Standard Humvees have no armor.  Up-armored Humvees have armor plate  
> on them.  I would agree that the UN Peacekeeper should have a  
> defensive rating of 2.  I don't think the issue was really brought  
> up until the Spartan hit the scene.
>
> Derek
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:09 PM, Ben Holko <[email protected]> wrote:
> yes I see, but the rules say anything more than 0mm will give a  
> defensive rating of 1 or more, dont Hummvee's have at least 1mm of  
> armor, and I know the UN peacekeeper has armor.....so shouldn't they  
> be more than 1 also?
>
>
> From: [email protected] on behalf of Derek Engelhaupt
> Sent: Thu 13/08/2009 12:55 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [TANKS] Re: Press Release from the Arrowhead Skunk Works
>
> http://www.rctankcombat.com/support-vehicles/SV015/
>
> The Spartan is a similar vehicle made by the British.
> Rating 0/2.  First number being number of rounds = 0 and the second
> number being the defensive rating = 2.
>
> Derek
> T065
>
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 9:33 PM, Ben Holko <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Being that the new M113A3 has speed, a large payload capacity, a  
> defensive rating of 2
>
> I thought any supply vehicle was a one-hit wonder?
>
> Of course if you stick a turret on it it's a different story...
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: [email protected] on behalf of Derek Engelhaupt
> Sent: Wed 12/08/2009 1:08 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [TANKS] Press Release from the Arrowhead Skunk Works
>
>
> PRESS RELEASE - Arrowhead News Organization (ARO) - August 11th, 2009
>
> Today in an undisclosed, secret location testing of a new supply  
> vehicle was conducted
> by the organization calling themselves the "Arrowhead Skunk Works"  
> or ASW for short.
> The attached video feed shows this new vehicle being tested at the  
> ASW's testing grounds
> in northern Minnesota.  Many Botham spies were detained and forced  
> to watch old episodes
> of Barney the purple dragon in obtaining this footage.  The footage  
> shows what looks to be
> an M113A3 Armored Personnel Carrier (APC) being put through it's  
> paces on some of the
> roughest terrain northern Minnesota can dish out.  Although the  
> tests looked to be somewhat
> successful, it looks like the ASW has some more work to do to ensure  
> their new vehicle is a
> force to be reckoned with on the modern battlefield.  This news  
> agency was able to secure an
> exclusive interview with a representative of the ASW who only  
> referred to himself as SGT. MP.
> He would not disclose his real name or position in the company.   
> When asked how the testing
> was going SGT. MP first tried to deny the existence of such a  
> vehicle or that any testing of any
> kind were being conducted at his facility, but after a few beers and  
> showing him the footage the
> ARO had clandestinely obtained SGT. MP began to talk.  At first he  
> started ranting about how
> his father didn't show him any love as a child and how his mother  
> had left them for a traveling
> vacuum salesman when he was six years old, but another couple of  
> rounds got him back on
> topic with regards to the new vehicle.  The video shows that the  
> M113A3 is quite capable of
> handling any battling terrain encountered in previous skirmishes,  
> but also shows failures of
> several key systems when pushed beyond what would normally be  
> expected in a battle.  SGT.
> MP commented, "there will always be stuff that will break when  
> testing a new vehicle."
> Additionally he said, "tracks and motor mounts can be fixed, people  
> are much harder to mend."
> Once again, this reporter thinks he was referring to his own  
> hardships as a child.  When asked
> what was the reason for the additional military build up SGT. MP  
> stated that it was related to
> some recent press releases about new vehicles being designated by  
> the Spanish.  He kept
> saying that the "Spanish Armada" was "comin' for us" and we needed  
> to be prepared.  With the
> recent need for additional UN troops and support around the world  
> the ARO asked why this
> vehicle didn't sport the UN white paint scheme.  His reply was  
> simply, "those UN guys are wimps.
> We at the ASW pick a side and get paid for our work.  And we get  
> paid well."  The question was
> then posed about where the loyalties of the ASW lie, but it seems  
> the beer had finally caught up
> with SGT. MP as his head came to a rest on the bar with a loud  
> thump.  The interview was over.
> It seems that despite the fact that the ASW's new vehicle broke a  
> motor mount, threw a track, and
> broke several track pads they are confident that the problems are  
> minor.  Being that the new
> M113A3 has speed, a large payload capacity, a defensive rating of 2,  
> and a lack of loyalty to any
> single party, it is apparent to this reporter that this new vehicle  
> could turn the tide of any battle it
> is involved in.
>
> Derek (vid is coming tomorrow, just couldn't wait)
> T065
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> -Mike Måne @
> http://moonrcprojects.googlepages.com
>
>
>
>
>
> >

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You are currently subscribed to the "R/C Tank Combat" group.
To post a message, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected]
Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to