Bernhard said: >That's why, some time ago, I suggested to go about work links >the same way as with subject headings. I mean, for many important >works that are relevant for this purpose, there are records in >LCSH already. Enhance these with a subfield for the relationship >term and you're done.
Isn't that the way we use MARC 7XX$a$t now, with the relationship in a 5XX note? Field 740 has 2nd indicator "2" to distinguish an analytic from a related work, but not 700 or 710 $a$t. The relationship subfield you suggest would be something new. But to me, such entries for related works/expressions/manifestations would more at home in MARC 7XX than 6XX. The same authority can serve as the basis for either. __ __ J. McRee (Mac) Elrod ([email protected]) {__ | / Special Libraries Cataloguing HTTP://www.slc.bc.ca/ ___} |__ \__________________________________________________________
