Thanks, kc -- Karen Coyle kco...@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net ph: 1-510-540-7596 m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet
Can anyone explain, or point me to an explanation, for how "Signatory
to a treaty, etc." became defined as an attribute of a Work, rather
than a corporate body with a relationship to a work? It's the only
potential Group 2 entity that has ended up in Group 1 space, so I
assume there is something particular about it.
- [RDA-L] Signatory to a treaty Karen Coyle
- Re: [RDA-L] Signatory to a treaty BEER,Chris
- Re: [RDA-L] Signatory to a treaty Mark K. Ehlert
- Re: [RDA-L] Signatory to a treaty Karen Coyle
- Re: [RDA-L] Signatory to a treaty Ed Jones
- Re: [RDA-L] Signatory to a treaty John Attig
- Re: [RDA-L] Signatory to a treaty Karen Coyle
- Re: [RDA-L] Signatory to a treaty Jonathan Rochkind
- Re: [RDA-L] Signatory to a treaty Karen Coyle
- Re: [RDA-L] Signatory to a treaty Ed Jones
- Re: [RDA-L] Signatory to a treaty John Attig