>The publisher statement, as transcribed from the manifestation, is
>simply a fact about the manifestation ...
So publisher statement in 260$b and publisher in 260$l? Seymour
Lubetsky will spin is his grave. I'm all for repeating 110 in 260$b
(contra Lubetsky), but again in $l? That will be a confusing,
repetitious, and space consuming display; I suppose we could program
to display 260$l only in the absense of $b?
I *know* RDA does not address display, but what is displayed to
patrons is the final product of the record, and vital to consider.
__ __ J. McRee (Mac) Elrod (m...@slc.bc.ca)
{__ | / Special Libraries Cataloguing HTTP://www.slc.bc.ca/
___} |__ \__________________________________________________________
