Am I correct in understanding RDA to move 110$kTreaties, etc. to 240?
Choice and form of treaty entry is about the only improvement RDA
makes over AACR2 IMNSHO.
But is it correct, as I have been told by one who understand RDA *far*
better then I, that "Protocols, etc." remains as 110$k? Why? Is that
an editorial oversight, taking an AACR2 practice into RDA? Isn't it
inconsistent with the treatment of treaties?
I need a MARC/RDA combo. Deborah Fritz where are you?
__ __ J. McRee (Mac) Elrod (m...@slc.bc.ca)
{__ | / Special Libraries Cataloguing HTTP://www.slc.bc.ca/
___} |__ \__________________________________________________________
