Yes, this is a good question. I don't think we've resolved yet whether once 
there is a conflict BOTH names/titles need to be qualified or just one.

Bob

Robert L. Maxwell
Special Collections and Ancient Languages Catalog Librarian
Genre/Form Authorities Librarian
6728 Harold B. Lee Library
Brigham Young University
Provo, UT 84602
(801)422-5568 

"We should set an example for all the world, rather than confine ourselves to 
the course which has been heretofore pursued"--Eliza R. Snow, 1842.


-----Original Message-----
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access 
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Layne, Sara
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2012 4:42 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Naming works question

I agree with Kevin. But would you also need to add "(Report)" to the reciprocal 
787? 

Sara (who doesn't yet catalog in RDA)

Sara Shatford Layne
Principal Cataloger
UCLA Library Cataloging & Metadata Center
sla...@library.ucla.edu

-----Original Message-----
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access 
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Kevin M Randall
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2012 3:36 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Naming works question

Adam Schiff wrote:

> The question that I have is how best to distinguish between the source
> work and
> the derivative work.  On the record for the summary I could add the
> following:
> 
> 787 08 $i Summary of (work): $t Water availability in the Ovens
> 
> but since the title is identical, this must have a qualifier of some sort, 
> yes?
> If so what would make a reasonable qualifier?  The reciprocal relationship
> would be:
> 
> 787 08 $i Summary (work): $t Water availability in the Ovens
> 
> Again, I think I need to break the conflict here by adding a qualifier.  I
> thought perhaps of using "(Summary)" but I've not seen this done in any
> other
> situation.

The addition of "(Summary)" seems like the most logical thing to do.  I've 
taken exactly this kind of approach on occasion, with things like Draft and 
Final versions of documents.

(BTW, I really dislike the use of the full Appendix J phrases in 7XX $i, 
instead of what's really meant for public display.  I'm looking forward to a 
metadata carrier that will allow us to *code* the relationships, so users won't 
be seeing "Summary of (work):" but instead will just see "Summary of:".)

Kevin M. Randall
Principal Serials Cataloger
Bibliographic Services Dept.
Northwestern University Library
1970 Campus Drive
Evanston, IL  60208-2300
email: k...@northwestern.edu
phone: (847) 491-2939
fax:   (847) 491-4345

Reply via email to