While the RDA "creator" element can be mapped to the MARC 1XX field, this 
mapping breaks down for works involving more than one creator, since the 1XX 
field is not repeatable. At present, subsequent creators are mapped to MARC 
7XX, which is also used for contributors, so they can only be identified by 
including a (more specific) relationship designator. Consequently, unless a 
relationship designator has been included in a given MARC 7XX, there is no way 
to accurately map the data to a record syntax such as Dublin Core or a 
FRBR-based syntax that routinely distinguishes creators from contributors.

One way around this conundrum would be to bring back a couple of second 
indicator values that were formerly valid in the 7XX fields. These values 
distinguished what were then called alternative entries (value=0, 
definition=added entry can be sub-filed by title [essentially a creator]) from 
secondary entries (value=1, definition=added entry can be sub-filed by main 
entry [essentially a contributor]).

Restoring these values in MARC 21 Bibliographic would enable us to distinguish 
creators from contributors without the need to supply a more specific 
relationship designator in each case. It would also give equivalent status to 
all creators, which is important if one is looking for all the works of a given 
creator (rather than those works on which he/she just happens to be named 
first).




Ed Jones
Associate Director, Assessment and Technical Services
National University Library
9393 Lightwave Avenue
San Diego, California  92123-1447

+1 858 541 7920 (voice)
+1 858 541 7997 (fax)

http://national.academia.edu/EdJones

Reply via email to