The RDA-MARC example bibliographic records in the Toolkit have examples with multiple designators after names in the 100 and 700 fields. The designators can fall into any category of relationship element.
http://www.rdatoolkit.org/sites/default/files/6jsc_rda_complete_examples_bibliographic_apr0913_rev.pdf 100 1# $a Porter, Kalan, $e composer, $e singer. 700 1# $a Morgan, Glen, $e screenwriter, $e film producer, $e film director. These conventions are MARC conventions, and so one would not find these in the RDA instructions. The parallel RDA record for each MARC record in the examples lists names by relationship element, so names can be listed several times. A "Creator" element can only have associated values that connect to the Work, whereas a "Contributor" element is specific to the Expression. A 700 field in MARC in undifferentiated, as the name could refer to a relationship to the Work, Expression, Manifestation, or Item. The name in the 100 field must have at least have one Work relationship because the main entry in AACR2 must be based on responsibility for the work, but the name could have additional relationships beyond a relationship to the Work. Thomas Brenndorfer Guelph Public Library > -----Original Message----- > From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access > [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Lee, Deborah > Sent: May-17-13 12:01 PM > To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA > Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Designator Relator Code > > We have decided to put multiple relationship designators in the 100, mostly > due to the fact that I can't find a rule or example which implies that this is > incorrect. I have to confess to feeling slightly uneasy when one of those > relationship designators is for a "creator" role and the other is for a > "contributor" role. However, the alternative of repeating the index term as a > 700 does feel a bit redundant. > > Best wishes, > > Debbie > > Deborah Lee > Senior cataloguer > Book Library > Courtauld Institute of Art > Somerset House > Strand > London WC2R 0RN > > Telephone: 020 7848 2905 > Email: deborah....@courtauld.ac.uk > Now on at The Courtauld Gallery: > > Becoming Picasso: Paris 1901 > 14 February - 27 May 2013 > > -----Original Message----- > From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access > [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Will Evans > Sent: 17 May 2013 14:29 > To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA > Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Designator Relator Code > > Mac et al, > > Are folks using multiple $e designators in a 100 field? Admittedly, I'm old- > school in my thinking, but I'm inclined to designate the principle role of the > individual in the $e of the 100 and add a 700 with the other designator(s). > > Any thoughts, yea or nay? > > Best, > > Will > > -----Original Message----- > From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access > [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of J. McRee Elrod > Sent: Friday, May 17, 2013 3:00 AM > To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA > Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Designator Relator Code > > Malar Thomas asked: > > >I have an item of which the author plays multiple roles. How can I > >enter the relator code, #e? > > > Subfield $e is repeating, separated by commas, e.g., 700 1 $aBlow, > Joe,$edirector,$eactor. If using codes, no commas: 700 1 $aBlow, > Joe.$4drt$4act. > > > __ __ J. McRee (Mac) Elrod (m...@slc.bc.ca) > {__ | / Special Libraries Cataloguing HTTP://www.slc.bc.ca/ > ___} |__ > \__________________________________________________________ > > The Courtauld Institute of Art is a company limited by guarantee (registered > in England and Wales, number 04464432) and an exempt charity. SCT > Enterprises Limited is a limited company (registered in England and Wales, > number 3137515). Their registered offices are at Somerset House, Strand, > London WC2R 0RN. The sale of items related to The Courtauld Gallery and its > collections is managed by SCT Enterprises Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary > of The Courtauld Institute of Art. > This e-mail, including any attachments, is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it > is > addressed. Any unauthorised dissemination or copying of this e-mail or its > attachments and any reliance on or use or disclosure of any information > contained in them is strictly prohibited and may be illegal. If you have > received this e-mail in error please notify us by return of e-mail [or by > telephone +44 (0) 20 7848 1273] and then delete it from your system. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > ------------------------------------------- > This email message has been delivered safely and archived online by > Mimecast. > For more information please visit http://www.mimecast.com > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > -------------------------------------------
