For what it's worth, the Draft PCC Guidelines for the Application of
Relationship Designators state the following:
Guideline 9.
If more than one relationship designator is appropriate because the same
entity has multiple roles, preferably use repeating $e (or $j for X11 fields).
If necessary, multiple headings may be used instead. Code relationship
designators in WEMI order.
100 1 Stone, Melicent, $e author $e illustrator.
Or, Optionally
100 1 Shore, David A., $e author.
700 1 Shore, David A., $e former owner. $e DNLM
I'll leave it to someone higher in the PCC hierarchy to tell us if this is
official PCC policy at this point.
Adolfo
Adolfo R. Tarango
Head - UC Systemwide Collection Services
atara...@ucsd.edu
858-822-3594
-----Original Message-----
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Brenndorfer, Thomas
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2013 9:16 AM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Designator Relator Code
The RDA-MARC example bibliographic records in the Toolkit have examples with
multiple designators after names in the 100 and 700 fields. The designators can
fall into any category of relationship element.
http://www.rdatoolkit.org/sites/default/files/6jsc_rda_complete_examples_bibliographic_apr0913_rev.pdf
100 1# $a Porter, Kalan, $e composer, $e singer.
700 1# $a Morgan, Glen, $e screenwriter, $e film producer, $e film director.
These conventions are MARC conventions, and so one would not find these in the
RDA instructions. The parallel RDA record for each MARC record in the examples
lists names by relationship element, so names can be listed several times. A
"Creator" element can only have associated values that connect to the Work,
whereas a "Contributor" element is specific to the Expression.
A 700 field in MARC in undifferentiated, as the name could refer to a
relationship to the Work, Expression, Manifestation, or Item. The name in the
100 field must have at least have one Work relationship because the main entry
in AACR2 must be based on responsibility for the work, but the name could have
additional relationships beyond a relationship to the Work.
Thomas Brenndorfer
Guelph Public Library
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and
> Access [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Lee, Deborah
> Sent: May-17-13 12:01 PM
> To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA<mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA>
> Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Designator Relator Code
>
> We have decided to put multiple relationship designators in the 100,
> mostly due to the fact that I can't find a rule or example which
> implies that this is incorrect. I have to confess to feeling slightly
> uneasy when one of those relationship designators is for a "creator"
> role and the other is for a "contributor" role. However, the
> alternative of repeating the index term as a
> 700 does feel a bit redundant.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Debbie
>
> Deborah Lee
> Senior cataloguer
> Book Library
> Courtauld Institute of Art
> Somerset House
> Strand
> London WC2R 0RN
>
> Telephone: 020 7848 2905
> Email: deborah....@courtauld.ac.uk<mailto:deborah....@courtauld.ac.uk>
> Now on at The Courtauld Gallery:
>
> Becoming Picasso: Paris 1901
> 14 February - 27 May 2013
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and
> Access [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Will Evans
> Sent: 17 May 2013 14:29
> To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA<mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA>
> Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Designator Relator Code
>
> Mac et al,
>
> Are folks using multiple $e designators in a 100 field? Admittedly,
> I'm old- school in my thinking, but I'm inclined to designate the
> principle role of the individual in the $e of the 100 and add a 700 with the
> other designator(s).
>
> Any thoughts, yea or nay?
>
> Best,
>
> Will
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and
> Access [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of J. McRee
> Elrod
> Sent: Friday, May 17, 2013 3:00 AM
> To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA<mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA>
> Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Designator Relator Code
>
> Malar Thomas asked:
>
> >I have an item of which the author plays multiple roles. How can I
> >enter the relator code, #e?
>
>
> Subfield $e is repeating, separated by commas, e.g., 700 1 $aBlow,
> Joe,$edirector,$eactor. If using codes, no commas: 700 1 $aBlow,
> Joe.$4drt$4act.
>
>
> __ __ J. McRee (Mac) Elrod (m...@slc.bc.ca<mailto:m...@slc.bc.ca>)
> {__ | / Special Libraries Cataloguing HTTP://www.slc.bc.ca/
> ___} |__
> \__________________________________________________________
>
> The Courtauld Institute of Art is a company limited by guarantee
> (registered in England and Wales, number 04464432) and an exempt
> charity. SCT Enterprises Limited is a limited company (registered in
> England and Wales, number 3137515). Their registered offices are at
> Somerset House, Strand, London WC2R 0RN. The sale of items related to
> The Courtauld Gallery and its collections is managed by SCT
> Enterprises Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of The Courtauld Institute of
> Art.
> This e-mail, including any attachments, is confidential and may be
> legally privileged. It is intended solely for the use of the
> individual(s) to whom it is addressed. Any unauthorised dissemination
> or copying of this e-mail or its attachments and any reliance on or
> use or disclosure of any information contained in them is strictly
> prohibited and may be illegal. If you have received this e-mail in
> error please notify us by return of e-mail [or by telephone +44 (0) 20 7848
> 1273] and then delete it from your system.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------------
> -------------------------------------------
> This email message has been delivered safely and archived online by
> Mimecast.
> For more information please visit http://www.mimecast.com
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------------
> -------------------------------------------
