700 1_ $i Contains (work): $a Estes, David. $t Anna's story.
should be
700 12 $i Contains (work): $a Estes, David. $t Anna's story.
The PCC recommended guidelines for use of relationship designators
(http://www.loc.gov/aba/pcc/rda/PCC%20RDA%20guidelines/Relat-Desig-Guidelines.docx)
say to include the relationship designator even when the MARC coding has the
same or similar meaning. In this case the second indicator value 2 tells you
that the thing in that field is contained within the resource described, but
the coding alone can't tell you whether it is a work or an expression, so the
relationship designator allows us to be more specific.
Adam Schiff
On Thu, 1 Aug 2013, Jean Marie Taylor wrote:
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 11:40:26 -0400
From: Jean Marie Taylor <jtay...@wrl.org>
Reply-To: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
<RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA>
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: [RDA-L] 1st original RDA record - questions
Hello,
I just entered my first originally cataloged RDA record to OCLC and have a
couple of questions if the group would be so kind
to review my record.
I apologize for bringing up the self-published issue again so soon after the
previous discussion but here are my questions:
In my record:
264 1[Place of publication not identified] : ǂb [David Estes], ǂc [2012]
264 2[North Charleston, South Carolina] : ǂb [CreateSpace]
What is on the resource is:
c2012 David Estes
Made in the USA, Lexington, KY, 28 June 2013
Amazon has:
Publisher: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform (November 23, 2012)
So for the publication statement I have:
264 _1 $a [Place of publication not identified] : $b [David Estes], $c [2012]
The author travels all over the world so I didn't think I could use [United
States].
For the distribution statement I have:
264 _2 $a [North Charleston, South Carolina] : $b [CreateSpace]
I looked up the location of the corporate headquarters of CreateSpace on the
Internet.
[North Charleston, South Carolina] is required because the place of publication
is not
provided in the publication statement. Is that correct?
[CreateSpace] is not technically required because there is a publisher in the
264 _1 but
I wanted CreateSpace in the record. The date is not required in the 264 _2 for
the same reason.
Is that correct?
Also, I think of CreateSpace as more of a manufacturer than a distributor (with
Amazon
being the distributor) but the recent discussion on the list has been referring
to
CreateSpace as a distributor and CreateSpace does sometimes refer to themselves
as a distributor.
**********************************************************
The other problem is there is a long short story (41 p.) contained in the book.
I made this 500 note.
Includes Anna's story, a dwellers short story and an excerpt from Fire country,
book 1 of
The country saga.
I added a 700 12 Estes, David. $t Anna's story.
I consulted 25.1 and J.5.4 in RDA and the MARC mappings for the whole-part
relationship
information. I did see examples in the LCPS for something like this:
700 1_ $i Contains (work): $a Estes, David. $t Anna's story.
but that wouldn't validate. Also the 774 can be used I think.
What is the current "best practice" in this area?
Thanks a lot for your consideration.
Jean Marie Taylor
Technical Services
Williamsburg Regional Library
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Adam L. Schiff
Principal Cataloger
University of Washington Libraries
Box 352900
Seattle, WA 98195-2900
(206) 543-8409
(206) 685-8782 fax
asch...@u.washington.edu
http://faculty.washington.edu/~aschiff
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
