If there is no appropriate term in RDA, you certainly may use a controlled term from another list. The problem in MARC is that we cannot specify what controlled list these terms come from.

Adam Schiff


On Tue, 29 Oct 2013, Lynne LaBare, Senior Librarian/Cataloger wrote:

Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 13:07:47 -0600
From: "Lynne LaBare, Senior Librarian/Cataloger" <lyn...@provolibrary.com>
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Appropriate Relationship Designator

J. McRee Elrod wrote:

Yes, if the Museum is 264 1 $b.

The 264 field appears as:

264 1 |a Buffalo, N.Y. :|b Firefly Books, |c 2013.

In this case, do I simply add the corporate name heading (access point) without any relationship designator even though the Natural History Museum holds the copyright and appears in the title? I found the term "copyright holder" [cph] in the MARC Code List for Relators (http://www.loc.gov/marc/relators/relaterm.html) , but am I correct in my understanding that we should avoid using these terms in RDA bib records if possible?

*Lynne J. LaBare
Senior Librarian, Cataloger
Provo Library at Academy Square
550 North University Avenue Provo, Utah 84601-1618
801.852.7672
801.852.6670 (fax)
Email: lyn...@provo.lib.ut.us <mailto:lyn...@provo.lib.ut.us>

Description: library logo color white backgroundSMALL*





^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Adam L. Schiff
Principal Cataloger
University of Washington Libraries
Box 352900
Seattle, WA 98195-2900
(206) 543-8409
(206) 685-8782 fax
asch...@u.washington.edu
http://faculty.washington.edu/~aschiff
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

<<attachment: lynnel.vcf>>

Reply via email to