That would be a "naughty designator" rather than an "inappropriate one"! It's way before Friday for humor, isn't it? ;0)

On Tue, 29 Oct 2013, Kevin M Randall wrote:

Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 20:29:48 +0000
From: Kevin M Randall <k...@northwestern.edu>
Reply-To: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
    <RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA>
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Appropriate Relationship Designator

Like one that would be used for a particular work by Nathaniel Hawthorne, I 
suppose?

Kevin

-----Original Message-----
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Wagstaff, D John
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2013 3:23 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Appropriate Relationship Designator

Can anyone point me to an "inappropriate relationship designator"? That
sounds a lot more fun...

(Sorry, but I couldn't resist.)

John


John Wagstaff
Head, Music & Performing Arts Library
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
1114 W. Nevada Street
Urbana IL61801
Tel. 217-244-4070
e-mail: wagst...@illinois.edu



-----Original Message-----
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of J. McRee Elrod
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2013 3:20 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Appropriate Relationship Designator

Lynne asked:

In this case, do I simply add the corporate name heading (access point)
without any relationship designator even though the Natural History
Museum holds the copyright ...

Kevin advises no relationship designator if none applies,  Another poster
has advised that if no exact term works, use the larger category. even if
not the the lists.  (The MRIs add those categories to its list.)  In this case
you might consider $ecreator.  The body has a more important
relationship to the item than just holding the copyright.

You are right, I think, that the terms from the $4 code list should not be
used in $e.  You could use the $4 code, but as I said, the relationship is
larger and more important than just copyright holder, so I would not.


   __       __   J. McRee (Mac) Elrod (m...@slc.bc.ca)
  {__  |   /     Special Libraries Cataloguing   HTTP://www.slc.bc.ca/
  ___} |__ \__________________________________________________________


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Adam L. Schiff
Principal Cataloger
University of Washington Libraries
Box 352900
Seattle, WA 98195-2900
(206) 543-8409
(206) 685-8782 fax
asch...@u.washington.edu
http://faculty.washington.edu/~aschiff
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Reply via email to