On Saturday, March 13, 2010, 23:53:20, Whit Blauvelt wrote: > That would be curious, since the file wasn't deleted on the original system. > If you're right then --max-file-size = treat as if the original's been > deleted. Which seems wrong, since it hasn't been. I think that would qualify > as a bug?
I'd say this is expected behaviour - the destination saw the file on previous run, but didn't see it on current run (because the source likely doesn't inform it about files it skips), so it treats the file as deleted on source. -- < Jernej Simončič ><><><><>< http://eternallybored.org/ > No child throws up in the bathroom. -- Laura's Law _______________________________________________ rdiff-backup-users mailing list at rdiff-backup-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/rdiff-backup-users Wiki URL: http://rdiff-backup.solutionsfirst.com.au/index.php/RdiffBackupWiki
