1.000 SG is water & 1.100 SG is like mild vinegar.

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dana Orzel 

Great Solar Works, Inc -  NABCEP # 051112-136

E - d...@solarwork.com  - Web - solarwork.com 

O - 970.626.5253  C - 208.721.7003

"Responsible Technologies for Responsible People since 1988"  

P Please consider the environment before printing this email.

 

 

From: RE-wrenches [mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf 
Of Allan Sindelar
Sent: Monday, December 21, 2015 10:16 AM
To: RE-wrenches
Subject: [RE-wrenches] Fwd: Refractometer reading has me stumped

 

Wrenches,
For years I have carried and used a refractometer to accurately measure SG of 
FLA batteries. I currently have a decent one, a nearly new Bosch Robinair 75240 
that has always performed as intended. 

A couple of days ago I was hired by another local company to investigate and 
troubleshoot an off grid system that they had recently installed that was not 
keeping up with the customer's needs and had crashed. I'll give more details 
below, but the short question is that on a very cold day, I began measuring the 
SG of the batteries and got readings of between 1.00 and 1.10 on all of the 
cells I tested, with no obvious cause. I have never seen this and am stumped as 
to the cause. I tested SG on about six cells in various locations and got 
readings nearly identical, and all off the scale on the low side. Note that I 
used the supplied pipette to sample electrolyte well below the surface of the 
full cells, and they were lightly gassing at the time, so I don't think that 
this is simply highly stratified electrolyte.

The system: 12 x 327 Sunpower modules (3.9 kW) on fixed rack; Schneider XW6048 
with Power Distribution Panel, XW600-80 charge controller, System Control 
Panel, unused AGS and Schneider's new Conext Battery Monitor. Batteries are two 
strings of 8 Surrette S550s, for about 32 kw-hours of C/20 storage to 80% DOD. 
The system has been in operation for only about 3 months. The installation 
quality is mediocre at best, was located in an unheated TuffShed and is 
powering a doublewide mobile home. The inverter, controller and SCP were 
connected by the Xanbus system, but the Conext battery monitor was not. 

The backup generator was a very basic manual-start 6kW Briggs & Stratton that 
had not been able to charge through the inverter as the inverter hadn't been 
properly programmed and would overload it. The site is at about 8,000' 
elevation, so we estimated about 4kW maximum output at 240V AC. 

I hadn't seen pictures or been given an accurate component list before arriving 
on site, so was not fully prepared for what I found. The day was sunny and 
especially cold - best guess a high in the mid-20s (F). After four hours on 
site my fingers were too stiff to write normally. The battery SOC monitor 
indicated 100%, and the SCP bar graph also estimated the batteries to be nearly 
full. Battery voltage under charge on each 6V battery ranged from a low of 
7.38V to a high of 7.50V, with a charge rate low enough to suggest absorption. 
The batteries had not been equalized since new, but new was claimed to be three 
months ago, and this appeared accurate.

The system owners are new to off grid, and while living frugally, claimed that 
the system worked well during sunny periods but had crashed on about the second 
day of cloudy weather. They had been using the forced air furnace, and when I 
arrived had a heat lamp (not labeled as to watts, but I assume 250W 130V) 
inside the leaky battery box, shining on some of the batteries. 

As an aside, the 600V Schneider controller has no built-in display/interface, 
so there was no easy way to determine the charge mode or anything else except 
through the System Control Panel. That seems pretty bogus to me. I had not seen 
one of these previously, nor had I seen Schneider's shunt-based SOC meter. When 
I have installed XWs and SW Conexts I have always used Midnite E-Panels, which 
have conventional 500A shunts, and TriMetrics to offer accurate SOC for the 
customer.

The system settings all appeared to be set to default, other than "flooded" for 
battery type. Here are the changes I made in the setup. A couple of things I 
noticed: 
    1) with a default LBCO of 40.0V, on at least two occasions the batteries 
had been completely drained, and had been recharged only by the (substantial) 
array; but as the array is in theory (3.9kW/58V = 65A in good sun, or a c/12 
charge rate, this suggests that even empty batteries will be recharged to full 
in 2-3 days.
    2) battery capacity was set at default of 440AH, when it was actually about 
850AH,so the charge rate would have tapered prematurely.
    3) The bulk voltage was the default for 'flooded' - I don't know the 
default, as it isn't given in the XW manual and I changed it to 'custom'. I 
assume about 58.4V.

Setting name                                                   Previous setting 
          New setting

Inverter LBCO (V)                                                     40.0      
                       (!)   45.2

LBCO delay (seconds)                                               10           
                    600

HBCO (V)                                                                  70.0  
                           64.4

Battery capacity (AH)                                                           
 440 D                          800

Max charge rate (%)                                                    100 D    
                      72

AC2 input Vmin (V)                                                   80         
                       105

AC input priority                                                        AC1    
                        AC2

Charge control and inverter EQ (V)                           64.0 D             
            62.2

CC and inverter bulk & absorption voltage (V)         57.6 D                    
     58.8

CC and inverter float (V)                                           54.0 D      
                   53.6


Given all of this, I can't explain the extremely low SG readings. I tested 
about six or eight of the 48 cells, and all showed the same range. I admit that 
I trust my refractometer, but given the other readings, could I actually have 
completely dead cells, only three months old, showing close to 60V with little 
current flowing in while I measured them? WTF is going on here?
Thank you, as always,
Allan
-- 
Allan Sindelar
al...@sindelarsolar.com
NABCEP Certified PV Installation Professional
NABCEP Certified Technical Sales Professional
New Mexico EE98J Journeyman Electrician
Founder (Retired), Positive Energy, Inc.
505 780-2738 cell 

_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Redwood Alliance

List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

Change listserver email address & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/maillist.html

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out or update participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org

Reply via email to