On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 9:06 PM, Arne Babenhauserheide <arne_...@web.de>wrote:
> Hm, I did not even know about the splice rule.
>
> So, if it’s already necessary for syntax, \ would indeed be equivalent.
>
> I’m just used to using it for escaping special characters, so it seems
> odd to me to see it on a line on its own :)
>
> Best wishes,
> Arne
>
Do be aware that the \ splice thing is not yet officially part of
sweet-expressions; dwheeler made a draft of the splice rules but hasn't
made a 0.3 sweet-expressions spec including it.
For now I think we should investigate the following alternatives:
1. \ = GROUP = SPLICE, remove SPLICE-at-the-eol rule.
2. . = GROUP, \ = SPLICE
2.1. remove SPLICE-at-the-eol rule.
2.2. don't remove SPLICE-at-the-eol rule.
Sincereyl,
AmkG
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Readable-discuss mailing list
Readable-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/readable-discuss
