Alan Manuel Gloria: > Hmm, in the code above you are putting it in between the "GUILE BEGINS > - GUILE ENDS" pair, which I added so that we could mindlessly delete > it when trying on non-Guile implementations.
> Is this deliberate? I think you are trying to make a portability layer. You bet I am. It probably belongs in some sort of special "portability layer" section, but I thought I'd start using the section that we had. I try to pull out "stuff that varies" into a section (even though I only have one implementation), and then later work out how to make that vary between implementations (once I know what needs to adjust). > I think we should start seriously using cond-expand (SRFI-0), how > portable is it? SRFI-0 seems to be pretty widely supported: http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-implementers.html --- David A. Wheeler ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Readable-discuss mailing list Readable-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/readable-discuss
