As pointed in the [Rationale] wiki article: "This use of {...} is
highly compatible with various Lisps. I think this rule would be a
great backwards-compatible addition to the *standard* reader of any
Scheme and Common Lisp implementation. Scheme specifically reserves
{...} for future use (R5RS section 2.3, R6RS section 4.21)."
There is currently an R7RS standardization process on-going. Would it
be appropriate for us to essentially barge in with the idea that the
reserved {...} can now be committed to curly-infix?
curly-infix seems to be the least controversial and most stable part
of the spec.
I wonder what the process is for putting in a new idea in the current
R7RS discussion.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Readable-discuss mailing list
Readable-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/readable-discuss
