Re: Generating libraries from RB: was: Your 3 wishes for RS to implement in 2007

[Norman Palardy]

On Jan 03, 2007, at 9:23 PM, Daniel Stenning wrote:
Since one deals with building dylibs while the one you mention is
specifically for building RB specific plugins, I think theyre  
better left
separate.  In any case I think we are basically in agreement.

What were the significant bugs you had in mind ?

Some of them are

        http://www.realsoftware.com/feedback/viewreport.php?reportid=otrltbzq
        http://www.realsoftware.com/feedback/viewreport.php?reportid=rcyylala
        http://www.realsoftware.com/feedback/viewreport.php?reportid=rjgkpbpz
        http://www.realsoftware.com/feedback/viewreport.php?reportid=clzkocof
        http://www.realsoftware.com/feedback/viewreport.php?reportid=bcwrzdce
        http://www.realsoftware.com/feedback/viewreport.php?reportid=yiwdfrbo
        http://www.realsoftware.com/feedback/viewreport.php?reportid=obbfaqmi
        http://www.realsoftware.com/feedback/viewreport.php?reportid=xfulbqla
        http://www.realsoftware.com/feedback/viewreport.php?reportid=pycixjiv
        http://www.realsoftware.com/feedback/viewreport.php?reportid=pozpnntn
        http://www.realsoftware.com/feedback/viewreport.php?reportid=vcfbyixg

the previous three I'd fix with my own code if it weren't for http:// 
www.realsoftware.com/feedback/viewreport.php?reportid=yzbmlncg

Now, to be fair there are something like 500+ verified reports  
against the IDE and this is only a small handful
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>