I disagree. It was largely Java that dealt the blow to PB ( at least in the London financial district where I worked at the time ) and nothing to do with the way PB was being managed. As for Watcom , that became the basis for their mobile market. It was maybe a shame to see the C++ compiler die a death, but then there were other C compilers out there already - the market was very small for watcom as a compiler company. It was the small footprint database server that sybase wanted watcom for.
PB is as far as I can tell still developing fine. There are many IT organisations who went for bloated java projects that would have been far better off just sticking with PB. On 6/1/07 19:16, "Norman Palardy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > PowerBuilder and Watcom were both acquisitions that they've managed > to death _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives of this list here: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
