on 1/10/07 11:54 PM, Glenn L. Austin at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Jan 10, 2007, at 7:11 PM, Jonathan Johnson wrote: >> On Jan 10, 2007, at 8:55 PM, Glenn L. Austin wrote: >>> On Jan 10, 2007, at 12:26 PM, Jonathan Johnson wrote: >>> >>>> On Jan 10, 2007, at 2:20 PM, Stefan wrote: >>>> >>>>> If I compile an app for Mach-O, which is the minimal OS X >>>>> release required? >>>> >>>> It's supposed to be Mac OS X 10.2, but there is a bug in the >>>> current release with exceptions on 10.2. We are looking into >>>> fixing this for the next release, so currently the minimum is 10.3. >>> >>> And Universal Binary (or Intel) requires 10.4. >> >> This is incorrect. Universal Binaries will run on 10.3, and when we >> fix this bug, 10.2 as well. > > That's interesting, since Intel machines only ship with 10.4.
A universal binary application is contains both PowerPC and Intel code. Obviously the Intel part only runs on Intel systems which as you say need 10.4 (I think it is actually a few point releases higher than that). The PowerPC part has system requirements as Jon suggests. From a purely technical standpoint you could make a UB that had a PowerPC part that ran on 10.0 but who would want to. Chris _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives of this list here: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
