I still have my 1 GHz 17" PowerBook, model A, 3+ years, works like a
charm, and will run 10.5 as soon as it is available. My 1.4 GHz
Mini, 2 years is also running, so I don't see your point. Well
actually I do see one of your points, I am buying more macs, but I
keep on using them.
Trausti
On Jan 11, 2007, at 8:15 PM, Daniel L. Taylor wrote:
Ummm, yes, that's what I meant.
PPC to 10.2.(8?), Intel starts at 10.4.something.
Although I have to admit, even the thought of supporting 10.3 now
fills my mind with dread -- and even though I do still have machines
that will run Mac OS 9, I haven't even run Classic for a couple of
years.
How times have changed.... Macintosh used to be the system with
good backwards compatibility, and its user base would brag that you
didn't have to upgrade machines, OS, or software as often.
Now if you're below 10.3.9 (Xcode UB) you're out of the loop, and
quite frankly I've replaced my Macs more often since OS X came out
than my PCs.
Oh well...maybe MS will "catch up" and force a few rounds of
upgrades with Vista :-/
Daniel L. Taylor
Taylor Design
Computer Consulting & Software Development
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.taylor-design.com
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>