Create a class with a protected constructor only.
Then you must subclass it to be able to use it.
Björn
Daniel Stenning wrote:
We already have class methods in RB - only they are called "shared methods".
I agree that pure virtual methods would be nice. It only makes sense to add
such a feature if RB then enforces that any subclass MUST implement that
method. ( although in many cases almost similar results could be achieved
via interfaces or events).
On 17/1/07 04:42, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It would also be nice to have pure
virtual functions and class methods but I expect we'll get them
eventually.
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>
Search the archives of this list here:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
