On 17/feb/07, at 19:08, Kirk Gray wrote:

From what I've seen in it, Objective-Basic is an attempt at one-to- one translation of Objective-C to a Basic-like language. But it doesn't offer anything else. Where RealBasic offers a great IDE, and cross-platform API -- Objective-Basic offers only a Basic-like Objective-C.

So why not just learn Objective-C and skip the middle man?


We are talking about using RB for Mac applications. Cross-platform is out of discussion here and, if a developer need it, RB is surely one of the best choices if not the best.

About Objective-Basic, I'm not an advocate of this tool, however it's getting better at every release. While the inital builds were bare one-to-one translations of Obj-C to basic, the last build seems to offer an higher level API. The IDE needs some more work, but for the GUI part uses Interface Builder as Xcode. I agree that skipping the middle man is a better choice, but sometimes an easy approach can help. And this is the case of mony RB developers.

Massimo

Chiacchiera con i tuoi amici in tempo reale! http://it.yahoo.com/mail_it/foot/*http://it.messenger.yahoo.com _______________________________________________
Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode:
<http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/>

Search the archives:
<http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>

Reply via email to