Thanks for your reply!
On 2007-04-23, at 16:21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Apr 22, 2007, at 18:18 UTC, Sven E Olsson wrote: > >> I have an "not supported by RB issue" on OS X, that already exists >> and could be set in a property pane, but I NEED to to it in the fly.. >> Any experience of the RS Paid support to fix such things.. (turn that >> value on/off) > > My guess is that, since this is not a bug, the paid fix program would > not apply. If it's a property that can only be set at design time, > then there's probably a deep architectural reason for it (like, > there's > a completely different implementation under the hood that's used based > on the value of that property). Changing that might require a LOT of > targeted engineering time. > > Still, it wouldn't hurt to ask. Ok.. I see, as you wrote, we don't know how "big operation" this is. > > But meanwhile, have you considered using two controls, differing by > the > value of that property, and you show/hide the one you need at runtime? I have tested to do a "fix" by my self, in more than two days, there is always a "complication" like my splitter do not work longer, also a lot of rewriting code (and generate new bugs).. Using classes do not work, because it is "the used control" that say yes/no.. I can't do the settings in the used class.. Thanks, Sven E > > Best, > - Joe > > -- > Joe Strout -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sven E ----------------------- REALbasic 2007R1 OS X 10.4.8 Intel and 10.4.6 PPC SEEdit Maxi THE XHTML EDITOR FOR MACINTOSH http://www.seedit.info _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
