I get the point now. I'm so used to optimizing my loops that I didn't consider somebody would actually put a dim inside a for-next loop.
So really, this should be checking for dims inside loops, rather than every block. -- Thom McGrath, <http://www.thezaz.com/> "Only those who have the patience to do simple things perfectly will acquire the skill to do difficult things easily." - Johann Freidreich Von Schiller On Apr 30, 2007, at 10:10 PM, Tim Hare wrote: > Note, however, that there is overhead associated with DIM in that it > initializes the variable; it isn't purely a scope thing. Dimming a > variable > inside a loop will add overhead to the loop and should be treated > in the > same way as other loop invariants - move them outside the loop. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe or switch delivery mode: <http://www.realsoftware.com/support/listmanager/> Search the archives: <http://support.realsoftware.com/listarchives/lists.html>
